Montana Refining Company (Board decision, December 10, 1997)
In re Montana Refining Company (EAB RCRA Appeal No. 95-8): appeal dismissed with prejudice
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1997, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Montana Refining Company asked the EAB to dismiss its petition challenging an August 14, 1995 permit. Montana said that EPA and Montana had issued a replacement joint permit effective December 2, 1997, and that the new permit resolved the issues behind the petition. EPA did not object to dismissal. The Board found good cause, granted the motion, and dismissed the appeal with prejudice.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: None stated in the decision.
- Outcome: The appeal was dismissed with prejudice on the petitioner's motion.
- Key point: The Board dismissed the permit appeal after a replacement joint permit resolved the issues that motivated the original petition.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
In re: )
)
Montana Refining Company ) RCRA Appeal No. 95-8 )
Docket No. MTD000475194 )
)
)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
By motion dated December 8, 1997, the Montana Refining
Company ("MRC") requests that the Board dismiss MRC’s petition
for review filed in the above-captioned matter. In support of
this motion, MRC states:
Consistent with the terms outlined in the parties’ Joint Motion for Stay of Proceedings filed on September 17, 1996, and subsequent status reports filed with the Board, EPA and the State of Montana have issued MRC a joint permit that replaces the August 14, 1995, permit that is the subject of this Petition for Review. This new, joint permit which became effective on December 2, 1997, includes provisions agreed by the parties to resolve the issues that motivated MRC to file its petition for review.
Counsel for EPA advises that the Agency has no objection to the granting of this motion.
For good cause shown, the motion is granted and MRC’s appeal
is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
So ordered.
Dated: 12/10/97
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
By: /s/
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the forgoing Order
Dismissing Appeal in the matter of Montana Refining Company, RCRA
Appeal No. 95-8, were sent to the following persons in the manner
indicated:
First Class Mail
John T. Smith
Postage Prepaid: Covington & Burling
1201 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Peter M. Ornstein
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA, Region VIII
999 18th Street
Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
Dated: 12/10/97
/s/
Mildred T. Johnson
Staff Assistant
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace