NewChem, Inc. Facility (Board decision, March 19, 2012)
In re NewChem, Inc. Facility (EAB RCRA (3008) 12-01): appeal dismissed after EPA withdrew challenged decision
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
NewChem, Inc. appealed EPA Region 3's November 29, 2011 Final Decision and Response to Comments concerning its proposed remedy. NewChem and EPA Region 3 later filed a joint notice of voluntary dismissal after working cooperatively to resolve the appeal. EPA withdrew the challenged final decision and reopened the Statement of Basis, giving NewChem an opportunity to submit comments and additional information about the proposed remedy. The Board dismissed the appeal.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: None stated in the order.
- Outcome: The appeal was dismissed after EPA withdrew the challenged final decision and reopened the Statement of Basis.
- Key point: Withdrawal of the challenged decision and reopening of the Statement of Basis ended the appeal while allowing NewChem to submit further comments and information.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
) Appeal No. RCRA (3008) 12-01
In re: NewChem, Inc. Facility )
)
EPA ID No. WVD07968413 )
)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Appellant NewChem, Inc. (NewChem”) filed a Notice of Appeal and Appeal Brief on
February 14th, 2012. On March 5th, 2012, NewChem and EPA Region 3 filed a Joint Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with the Board. In that notice, EPA Region 3 and NewChem inform the Board that they have worked cooperatively to resolve the issues raised in the appeal. As a result EPA has withdrawn the November 29, 2011 Final Decision and Response to Comments that was the subject of NewChem’s appeal. Region III has reopened the Statement of Basis associated with that Final Decision and NewChem will have the opportunity to submit comments and additional information regarding EPA’s proposed remedy. The Parties therefore request the Board to dismiss NewChem’s Appeal.
Having duly considered the matter and for good cause shown, the Board DISMISSES
Appeal No. RCRA (3008) 12-01.
So Ordered.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Date: March 19, 2012 Anna L. Wolgast
Environmental Appeals Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Appeal, in the matter of
NewChem, Inc. Facility, RCRA (3008) 12-01, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:
By Pouch Mail & Fax
Yvette Hamilton-Taylor
Diane Ajl
Office of Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region III
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Fax: 215-814-2603
Abraham Ferdas
Division Director
Land and Chemicals Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region III
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Fax: 215-814-3114
By First Class Mail
- Jeffrey McNealey
Christen Moore
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP
41 South High Street, 30th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Fax: 614-227-2000Annette Duncan Secretary March 19, 2012
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace