The Dow Chemical Company, Hanging Rock Plant (Board decision, December 16, 2008)

In re The Dow Chemical Company, Hanging Rock Plant (EAB RCRA Appeal No. 06-01): appeal withdrawn and dismissed with prejudice

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
RCRA 06-01, OHD 039 128 913
Decided
December 16, 2008
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2008
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the permit appeal. The Board granted Dow's request to withdraw RCRA Appeal No. 06-01 and dismissed the appeal in its entirety with prejudice. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Dow Chemical Company sought review of a RCRA permit for its Hanging Rock Plant. Dow notified the Environmental Appeals Board that it was withdrawing the appeal. The Board granted the request and dismissed RCRA Appeal No. 06-01 in its entirety with prejudice. The order does not impose a penalty or decide the merits of the permit challenge.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the release.
  • Outcome: Dow's request to withdraw the appeal was granted, and the appeal was dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: A petitioner may end a permit appeal by withdrawing it, after which the EAB can dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

                     BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
            UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                 WASHINGTON, D.C.

DEC 16 2008
Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS [illegible]

                                  )

In re: )
)
The Dow Chemical Company, )
Hanging Rock Plant ) RCRA Appeal No. 06-01
)
Permit No. OHD 039-128-913 )
)

               ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW PETITION FOR REVIEW

    On December 11, 2008, The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") filed a motion notifying

the Environmental Appeals Board of its withdrawal of RCRA Appeal No. 06-01.

    Dow's request to withdraw RCRA Appeal No. 06-01 is hereby granted, and the Board hereby

dismisses with prejudice the appeal in its entirety.

    So ordered.

                                  ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

                                  By: ______________________________
                                      Charles J. Sheehan
                                      Environmental Appeals Judge

Dated: December 16, 2008

                          CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Granting Request to Withdraw Petition for

Review in the matter of The Dow Chemical Company, Hanging Rock Plant, RCRA Appeal No. 06-01, were
sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

First Class Mail
and Facsimile: Robert J. Schmidt
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur
41 South High Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Fax: 614-227-2100

EPA Pouch Mail and
Facsimile: Kevin C. Chow
Associate Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604
Fax: 312-886-0747

Dated: DEC 16 2008

Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace