Guardian Industries Corp. (Board decision, August 21, 1997)

In re Guardian Industries Corp. (EAB PSD Appeal Nos. 97-9 and 97-10): petitions dismissed with prejudice

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
PSD 97-9, PSD 97-10
Decided
August 21, 1997
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1997, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1997
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the consolidated PSD permit appeals. The Board granted the petitioners' motion to dismiss their petitions with prejudice after the parties resolved the issues raised in the petitions. The full text below is the official EPA release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Citizens' Environmental Coalition and Peter Goodman petitioned for review of a PSD permit issued to Guardian Industries for construction of a flat glass plant in Geneva, New York. The parties engaged in settlement negotiations and reported that all issues had been resolved. The petitioners then moved to dismiss their petitions with prejudice because the issues were moot. The Board granted the motion and closed both appeal files without deciding the merits of the permit challenges.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the released order.
  • Outcome: The petitions for review were dismissed with prejudice, and both appeal files were closed.
  • Key point: The EAB closed the permit appeals after the petitioners reported that settlement negotiations had resolved the issues.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the Matter of:
Guardian Industries Corp. PSD Appeal Nos. 97-9, 97-10 Permit No. B-3205-00041/00001

ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
On April 28, 1997, Citizens' Environmental Coalition (\"CEC\") filed a petition for review of a PSD permit issued by the State of New York's Department of Environmental Conservation (\"NYDEC\") to Guardian Industries, Inc. (\"Guardian\") on April 1, 1997, for the construction of a flat glass plant in Geneva, New York. On May 1, 1997, Peter Goodman filed a petition for review of the same permit. Pursuant to a request from this Board, NYDEC responded to the two petitions on May 29, 1997. Guardian also filed a response to the petitions, and requested the Board to consider its response, a request the Board granted.
Since that time, the four parties to this proceeding (CEC, Peter Goodman, Guardian and NYDEC), with the aid of U.S. EPA Region II, have been actively engaged in settlement negotiations. The parties requested, and the Board granted, several stays in this matter in order for the negotiations to proceed. The most recent stay expired on August 20, 1997.
On August 15, 1997, the parties filed a status report with this Board indicating that they had resolved all but one issue, which they expected to resolve before the August 20, 1997 expiration of the stay. Apparently, that issue has been

resolved, because on August 20, 1997, the petitioners filed, by

facsimile, a motion to dismiss their petitions for review with prejudice on the grounds that the issues raised therein are now

\"moot.\"
The petitioners' motion is hereby granted, and the petitions

for review are dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the file in each of the above-referenced docket numbers is closed.

So ordered.

ENVIRONMENTAL, APPEALS BOARD

By:
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petitions for Review in the Matter of Guardian Industries Corp., PSD Appeal Nos. 97-9, 10, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

First Class Mail,
Carl G. Dworkin, Esq.
Postage Prepaid
6281 Johnston Road
and facsimile: P.O. Box 3784
Albany, NY 12203
Fax: 518-452-5520

Diane Heminway
Citizens' Environmental Coalition
Western New York Office
339 N. Main Street, Suite A
Medina, NY 14103
Fax: 716-798-0146

Paul J. D'Amato
Regional Attorney
New York State Dept. Of
Environmental Conservation
6274 East Avon-Lima Rd.
Avon, NY 14414
Fax: 716-226-2830

David M. Friedland
Beveridge & Diamond, P.C.
1350 I Street, N.W.
Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20005
Fax: 202-789-6190

Walter Mugdan
Office of Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA, Region II
290 Broadway, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Fax: 212-637-3115

Dated:
A&' 2 1 ISISI?

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace