Victor McCoy v. Crescent Coal Company (Commission decision, November 5, 1981)
McCoy v. Crescent Coal (FMSHRC PIKE 77-71): Review petition dismissed as premature
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An ALJ found that Crescent Coal had unlawfully discharged Victor McCoy after he refused to ride an unsafe belt line into the mine. The judge ordered back pay and attorney fees but left their amounts for further proceedings. Crescent sought Commission review before those amounts were set. The Commission held that the judge had not yet made a final disposition that would start the review period and dismissed the petition as premature. It said the parties could seek review after the judge resolved the remaining award issues.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d), concerning discretionary Commission review.
- Outcome: Crescent's review petition dismissed as premature; back pay and fee amounts remained pending before the judge.
- Key point: An unresolved monetary award meant the ALJ decision was not yet final for discretionary review.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
VICTOR McCOY V. CRESCENT COAL
DDATE:
19811105
TTEXT:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. November 5, 1981 VICTOR McCOY, Complainant
v. Docket No. PIKE 77-71
CRESCENT COAL COMPANY,
Respondent
ORDER
On May 10, 1977, Victor McCoy filed a complaint of discrimination against Crescent Coal Company under section 110(b) of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C. $ 801 et seq., (1976 and Supp. I 1977) alleging he was discharged by Crescent on April 22, 1977 for refusing to ride an unsafe belt line into Crescent's mine. On September 28, 1981, the judge issued his decision finding that McCoy was discharged on April 22, 1977 in violation of section 110(b) of the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969; ordered respondent to pay back pay and attorney fees; ordered the parties to advise him in writing by October 15, 1981, whether they had agreed on the amounts of back pay and attorney fees; suggested that further proceedings may be necessary if the parties could not reach an agreement and retained jurisdiction for the purpose of determining the proper award. Crescent filed its petition for discretionary review on October 28, 1981 raising questions of law and fact relating to the judge's decision. On November 3, 1981 complainant filed a motion to dismiss Crescent's petition as being premature. In Gerald D. Boone v. Rebel Coal Company, 3 FMSHRC 1900 (Aug. 6, 1981) and Council of Southern Mountains, Inc. v. Martin County Coal Corporation, 2 FMSHRC 3216 (Nov. 12, 1980) the Commission considered situations analogous to the instant and concluded that failure to resolve monetary awards did not constitute a final disposition by the judge to initiate the running of the statutory review periods under section 113 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. $ 801 et. seq. (Supp. II 1978). In those cases the petitions for review were dismissed as premature. The reasoning and decisions in those cases are applicable to this proceeding.
~2276
Accordingly, complainant's motion to dismiss is granted and the petition for discretionary review filed by Crescent Coal Company is dismissed as premature. The parties may file petitions for discretionary review in accordance with section 113 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and Commission Rule 70 (29 C.F.R. 2700.70) once the judge has made his final disposition of this proceeding.
~2477
Distribution
David C. Stratton, Esq.
Stratton, May & Hays, PSC
P.0. Drawer 851
Pikeville, Kentucky 41501
Stephen Sanders, Esq.
Appalachian Research & Defense Fund of KY P.0. Box 152 Prestonsburg, Kentucky 41653 Chief Administrative Law Judge James A. Broderick FMSHRC 1730 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace