Reintjes of the South, Inc.
Reintjes of the South, Inc. (FMSHRC CENT 99-152-RM through CENT 99-335-M): Settlement approving $55,131 penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2000 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Reintjes of the South contested two citations and faced two related civil penalty proceedings involving the Ornet Corporation mine. The parties submitted a settlement under which the operator agreed to pay the full $55,131 penalty. Judge Avram Weisberger found the settlement acceptable under the Mine Act's penalty criteria, lifted the earlier stay, approved the settlement, and ordered payment within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d) and § 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the stay was lifted, and the operator was ordered to pay $55,131.
- Key point: The ALJ accepted a full-penalty settlement after reviewing the parties' representations and supporting documentation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
June 20, 2000
REINTJES OF THE SOUTH, INC. : CONTEST PROCEEDINGS
Contestant :
: Docket No. CENT 99-152-RM
v. : Citation No. 7867324; 01/21/99
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : Docket No. CENT 99-154-RM
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : Citation No. 7867336; 02/02/99
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), :
Petitioner : Ornet Corporation
: Mine ID No. 16-00354 FDP
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. CENT 99-195-M
Petitioner : A.C. No. 16-00354-05501 FDP
:
v. : Docket No. CENT 99-335-M
: A.C. No. 16-00354-05505 FDP
REINTJES OF THE SOUTH, INC., :
Respondent : Ornet Corporation
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Weisberger
The Stay Order previously issued in this case on January 6, 2000, is hereby lifted.
These cases are before me upon a petitions for assessment of civil penalty under
section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act), and notices of
contest filed by the operator. Petitioner has filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement
and to dismiss these cases. Respondent has agreed to pay the full penalty of $55,131.00. I have
considered the representations and documentation submitted in these cases, and I conclude that
the proffered settlement is acceptable under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
740
Page 2
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is
ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $55,131.00 within 30 days of this order. It is
further ORDERED that the parties shall abide by all the terms of the settlement.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Mark N. Savit, Esq., Patton Boggs, L.L.P., 2550 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20037-1350
Stephen E. Irving, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 525 Griffin Street,
Suite 501, Dallas, TX 75202
/sct
741
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2000, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.