Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. (ALJ decision, July 17, 1995)

Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. (FMSHRC PENN 95-80): Settlement reduces and modifies penalties

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 95-80
Decided
July 17, 1995
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1995
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final decision of an Administrative Law Judge
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) unless review was directed or sought. It is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. and the Secretary settled a civil penalty case involving five orders at the Emerald No. 1 Mine. The settlement reduced the penalties on two orders and reduced and reclassified three others as section 104(a) citations, deleting the unwarrantable-failure allegations. The approved penalties were $600, $4,000, $2,000, $3,000, and $6,000, totaling $15,600. The judge approved the settlement and ordered payment within 30 days, after which the case would be dismissed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provision(s): 30 U.S.C. §§ 801, 814(a), 814(d), and 820(i)
  • Outcome: Five orders were settled with reduced or modified penalties totaling $15,600; three were reclassified as section 104(a) citations and had unwarrantable-failure allegations deleted.
  • Key point: The approved settlement resolved the case through penalty reductions and removal of the unwarrantable-failure allegations from three orders.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

July 17, 1995

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
: Docket No. PENN 95-80
Petitioner
: A.C. No. 36-05466-04033
v. :
: Mine: Emerald No. 1
CYPRUS EMERALD RESOURCES
:
CORP.,
:
Respondent
:

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Appearances: Joseph T. Crawford, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner;
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Buchanan, Ingersoll, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Amchan

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. ' 801 et seq. Upon commence- ment of the hearing on May 31, 1995, the parties advised me that they had achieved a settlement of the entire case. The terms of the settlement are as follows:

Order No. 3668845: The penalty is reduced from $1,000 to $600.

Order No. 3668699: The penalty is reduced from $5,500 to $4,000.


Page 2

Order No. 3672349: This order is modified to a section 104(a) citation. The unwarrantable failure allegation is deleted and the penalty is reduced from $5,000 to $2,000.

Order No. 3672354: This order is modified to a section 104(a) citation. The unwarrantable failure allegation is deleted and the penalty is reduced from $4,200 to $3,000.

Order No. 3672355: This order is modified to a section 104(a) citation. The unwarrantable failure allegation is deleted and the penalty is reduced from $9,500 to $6,000.

I have considered the representations and documentation submitted and I conclude that the proffered settlement is consistent with the criteria in section 110(i) of the Act.

ORDER

WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED and Respondent shall pay the approved penalties within 30 days of this decision. Upon such payment this case is DISMISSED.

Arthur J. Amchan
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Joseph T. Crawford, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 14480 Gateway Building, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104

R. Henry Moore, Esq., Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C., 600 Grant Street, 58th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2887

\lh

2

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace