Jeddo-Highland Coal Company (ALJ decision, April 6, 1995)
Jeddo-Highland Coal Company (FMSHRC PENN 94-571-C): Compensation settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The United Mine Workers of America filed a compensation complaint concerning miners at Jeddo-Highland Coal Company's No. 7 Breaker. The company moved to approve a settlement agreeing to pay each named miner for the listed hours at the miner's regular rate of pay. The judge found the settlement consistent with section 111 of the Mine Act, approved it, and ordered payment through the miners' next paychecks. The case was to be dismissed after payment.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated by section number in the release.
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, payment was ordered, and the case was to be dismissed after payment.
- Key point: The judge approved compensation at the miners' regular pay rates for the hours listed in the settlement.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
[DOCID: f:pn94571.wais]
JEDDO-HIGHLAND COAL COMPANY
April 6, 1995
PENN 94-571-C
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
April 6, 1995
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF : COMPENSATION PROCEEDING AMERICA, LOCAL 1531, DIST. 2, :
Complainant : Docket No. PENN 94-571-C :
v. : Mine: No. 7 Breaker
:
JEDDO-HIGHLAND COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Amchan
This case is before me upon a complaint for compensation filed by the United Mine Workers of America, Local 1531, District 2. Respondent has filed a motion to approve settlement agreement. The terms of the settlement are that Respondent has agreed to pay each of the miners named on the Application for Compensation for the hours listed by each of their names by Complainant, at their regular rate of pay. Payment shall be included in each of the miners' next paychecks.
I have considered the representations and documentation submitted and I conclude that the proffered settlement is consistent with section 111 of the Act.
ORDER
WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED and Respondent shall pay the compensation agreed upon in the settlement agreement. Upon such payment this case is DISMISSED.
Arthur J. Amchan
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Paul F. Rento, United Mine Workers of America, Local 1531, District 2, 52 Cedar St., Hazelton, PA 18201
David H. Swisher, Esq., P.O. Box 450, Pittston, PA 18640
\lh
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace