Ambrosia Coal & Construction Company (ALJ decision, September 20, 1996)
Ambrosia Coal & Construction Company (FMSHRC PENN 93-233): Penalty reassessment schedule set on remand
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1996 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Commission remanded two Ambrosia Coal cases to Judge William Fauver for reassessment of civil penalties. The judge ordered the Secretary to propose revised penalties and explain them consistently with the Commission's decision and the Commission's penalty precedent. Ambrosia and the other respondent were given time to reply and recommend counter-proposals. The order addressed procedure only and did not itself set a penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 801
- Outcome: The judge set a schedule for proposed reassessed penalties and responses; he did not assess a new penalty.
- Key point: A remand order requiring penalty reassessment sets the process and briefing schedule but does not itself determine the revised penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
September 20, 1996
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 93-233 Petitioner : A.C. No. 36-04109-03520
v. :
: Ambrosia Tipple
AMBROSIA COAL &
:
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, :
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 94-15 Petitioner : A.C. No. 36-04109-03522 A
v. :
: Ambrosia Tipple
AMBROSIA COAL &
:
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY :
ORDER ON REMAND
Before: Judge Fauver
On September 12, 1996 the Commission remanded these cases to the judge for reassessment of civil penalties.
The Secretary shall have 15 days from the date of this Order to propose the amounts of reassessed civil penalties against Ambrosia and Steen with the reasons therefor consistent with the Commission’s decision in this case and in Sellersburg Stone Co., 5 FMSHRC 287, 293-3 (1983). Each Respondent shall have 10 days to reply to the Secretary’s proposed penalties and to recommend counter-proposals with the reasons therefor consistent with the above decisions.
William Fauver
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Jerold S. Feingold, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S.
Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room 400, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)
William P. Getty, Esq., Hugh F. McGough, Esq., Meyer, UnKovic & Scott, 1300 Oliver Bldg., Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (Certified Mail)
Frank G. Verterano & Manolis, 2622 Wilmington Road, New Castle, PA 16105 (Certified Mail)
nt
2
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace