Roxcoal Incorporated (ALJ decision, February 16, 1994)
Roxcoal Incorporated (FMSHRC PENN 93-225): Settlement approved, one citation modified, and $239 assessed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Roxcoal Incorporated faced a civil penalty proceeding involving two citations. The approved settlement removed the significant-and-substantial designation from Citation No. 3706730 and reduced its penalty from $169 to $50. Roxcoal also agreed to pay the proposed $189 penalty for Citation No. 3706729. The ALJ approved the settlement and ordered $239 total to be paid within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provision: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, one citation was modified, and $239 total was assessed.
- Key point: The settlement reduced one penalty and removed its significant-and-substantial designation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. ROXCOAL
DDATE:
19940216
TTEXT:
Page 2
~373
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 93-225 Petitioner : A. C. No. 36-07045-03598
v. :
: Barbara No. 1
ROXCOAL INCORPORATED,
:
Respondent :
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Hodgdon
This case is before me on a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 815(d). A hearing was scheduled for January 14, 1994, in Somerset, Pennsylvania. However, since the parties advised me that the case had been settled, the hearing was held on January 13, in Somerset.
The agreed on settlement provides that Citation No. 3706730 will be modified to delete the "significant and substantial" designation and the penalty will be reduced from $169.00 to $50.00, and that the Respondent will pay the proposed penalty of $189.00 for Citation No. 3706729 (Tr. 5-6). Having considered the representations submitted, I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 820(i).
Accordingly, the settlement is APPROVED, Citation No. 3706730 is MODIFIED as indicated above and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $239.00 within 30 days of this order. On receipt of payment, this case is DISMISSED.
T. Todd Hodgdon
Administrative Law Judge
(703) 756-4570
Page 3
~374
Distribution:
Pamela W. McKee, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 3535 Market Street, Gateway Building, Rm 14480, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Certified Mail)
Joseph A. Yuhas, Esq., 1809 Chestnut Avenue, Barnesboro, PA 15714 (Certified Mail)
John Kosic, Miner Representative, R.D. #1, Box 99, Glenco, PA 15543 (Certified Mail)
/lbk
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace