L&J Energy Company, Inc. (Commission decision, January 25, 1996)
L&J Energy Company, Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 93-15): Reconsideration partly granted; review remains pending
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1996, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor asked the Commission to reconsider its denial of L&J Energy Company’s petition for discretionary review. The Commission granted reconsideration in part and directed review only on issue IV from L&J’s petition. It stayed briefing until a further order and denied the request for oral argument.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)
- Outcome: Reconsideration was granted in part, review was directed on issue IV, briefing was stayed, and oral argument was denied.
- Key point: The Commission limited further review to one identified issue and left the remaining matters outside the directed review.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
January 25, 1996
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
:
v. : Docket No. PENN 93-15
:
L&J ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
:
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Doyle, Holen, Marks and Riley, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
The Secretary of Labor has filed a motion for reconsideration of the Commission’s January 11, 1996, denial of the petition for discretionary review previously filed by L&J Energy Company, Inc. (“L&J”). L&J supports the Secretary’s motion and requests oral argument. Upon review of the parties’submissions, the Secretary’s motion is granted in part. Review is directed only as to issue IV set forth in L&J’s petition. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the Commission and the request for oral argument is denied.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner
Arlene Holen, Commissioner
Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner
James C. Riley, Commissioner
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace