L&J Energy Company, Inc.
L&J Energy Company, Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 93-15): Partial reconsideration granted and review directed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1996, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor asked the Commission to reconsider its denial of L&J Energy Company’s petition for discretionary review. The Commission granted reconsideration in part and directed review only on issue IV from L&J’s petition. It stayed briefing until a further order and denied the request for oral argument.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)
- Outcome: Reconsideration was granted in part, review was directed on issue IV, briefing was stayed, and oral argument was denied.
- Key point: The Commission limited further review to one identified issue and left the remaining matters outside the directed review.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
January 25, 1996
SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) :
:
v. : Docket No. PENN 93-15
:
L&J ENERGY COMPANY, INC. :
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Doyle, Holen, Marks and Riley, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
The Secretary of Labor has filed a motion for reconsideration of the Commission’s
January 11, 1996, denial of the petition for discretionary review previously filed by L&J Energy
Company, Inc. (“L&J”). L&J supports the Secretary’s motion and requests oral argument. Upon
review of the parties’submissions, the Secretary’s motion is granted in part. Review is directed
only as to issue IV set forth in L&J’s petition. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the
Commission and the request for oral argument is denied.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner
Arlene Holen, Commissioner
Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner
James C. Riley, Commissioner
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1996. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.