Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, April 13, 1993)

Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC PENN 92-771): Sanitation citation modified in settlement

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 92-771
Decided
April 13, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-14

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Consolidation Coal agreed to settle one citation alleging that a bathroom at its preparation plant was not maintained in sanitary condition. The proposed settlement reduced the original $227 penalty to $175 and modified the citation to make the likelihood of injury unlikely and remove the significant-and-substantial designation. Judge Paul Merlin found the settlement appropriate under the statutory penalty criteria, approved it, and ordered payment of $175 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 77.402(a)
  • Outcome: Citation No. 3691596 was modified to remove its significant-and-substantial designation and change the injury likelihood to unlikely; the settlement penalty was set at $175.
  • Key point: The approved settlement reduced both the penalty and the citation's gravity-related designations.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 92-771
Petitioner : A.C. No. 36-
:
v. :
:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO MODIFY
ORDER TO PAY

Before: Judge Merlin

The above-captioned case was the subject of an extensive conference call between the undersigned and counsel for both parties on January 28, 1993. On March 15, 1993, the Solicitor filed a motion to approve settlement of the one violation in- volved in this case. The originally assessed penalty was $227 and the proposed settlement is for $175.

Citation No. 3691596 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
77.402(a) because the bathroom on the first floor of the pre plant was not maintained in sanitary condition. The Solicitor requests that the citation be modified to reduce the likelihood of injury from reasonably likely to unlikely and to delete the significant and substantial designation. The agreed upon settle- ment was reached at the January 28 conference call wherein the reasons for the modification and reduction were discussed and approved by the undersigned.

I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case along with the discussions on January 28, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.

In light of the foregoing, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED.

It is ORDERED that Citation No. 3691596 be MODIFIED to reduce the likelihood of injury from reasonably likely to unlike- ly and to delete the significant and substantial designation.

It is further ORDERED that the operator pay a penalty of $175 within 30 days of the date of this decision.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 14480 Gateway Bldg., 3535 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104

Daniel E. Rogers, Esq., Consol Inc., Consol Plaza, 1800 Washing- ton Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15241

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace