Helen Mining Company (ALJ decision, April 3, 1992)
Helen Mining Company (FMSHRC PENN 92-73): Settlement approved and penalty reduced to $600
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Helen Mining Company faced a civil penalty proceeding involving the Homer City Mine. At the hearing, the parties proposed resolving the case by reducing the penalty from $1,300 to $600 and dismissing the case after payment. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and ordered payment of $600 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the penalty was reduced to $600, and payment was ordered within 30 days.
- Key point: The judge approved the negotiated penalty reduction after considering the parties' representations and documentation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
MSHA V. HELEN MINING
DDATE:
19920431
TTEXT:
Page 2
~540
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 92-73 Petitioner : A.C. No. 36-00926-03905
v. :
: Homer City Mine
HELEN MINING COMPANY, :
Respondent :
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Richard W. Rosenblitt, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for the Petitioner;
Ronald B. Johnson, Esq., Volk, Frankovitch, Anetakis, Recht, Robertson & Hellerstedt, Wheeling, West Virginia, for the Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearing the parties filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $1,300 to $600 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case at hearing, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $600 within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace