Helen Mining Company (ALJ decision, April 3, 1992)

Helen Mining Company (FMSHRC PENN 92-73): Settlement approved and penalty reduced to $600

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 92-73
Decided
April 3, 1992
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1992
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision approving a settlement, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Helen Mining Company faced a civil penalty proceeding involving the Homer City Mine. At the hearing, the parties proposed resolving the case by reducing the penalty from $1,300 to $600 and dismissing the case after payment. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and ordered payment of $600 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, the penalty was reduced to $600, and payment was ordered within 30 days.
  • Key point: The judge approved the negotiated penalty reduction after considering the parties' representations and documentation.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. HELEN MINING
DDATE:
19920431
TTEXT:


Page 2

~540

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 92-73 Petitioner : A.C. No. 36-00926-03905
v. :
: Homer City Mine
HELEN MINING COMPANY, :
Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Appearances: Richard W. Rosenblitt, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for the Petitioner;
Ronald B. Johnson, Esq., Volk, Frankovitch, Anetakis, Recht, Robertson & Hellerstedt, Wheeling, West Virginia, for the Respondent.

Before: Judge Melick

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearing the parties filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $1,300 to $600 was proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case at hearing, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $600 within 30 days of this order.

Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace