Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, March 26, 1993)

Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC PENN 92-715): Four violations settled for $937 with two citation modifications

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 92-715
Decided
March 26, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Consolidation Coal Company agreed to settle four violations at its Dilworth Mine. The original penalties totaled $1,086, and the approved settlement required payment of $937. Judge Paul Merlin reduced the injury classification for the untagged power-circuit plug citation from fatal to permanently disabling because the voltage was lower than initially believed. He also deleted the significant-and-substantial designation from the unguarded crossunder citation because foot traffic under the moving belt was unlikely. The remaining two penalties were paid as originally assessed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 C.F.R. § 75.509 and 30 C.F.R. § 75.1722
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved at $937, with one citation modified to reduce the injury classification and another modified to delete its S&S designation.
  • Key point: A settlement may change a citation's injury classification or S&S designation when the record supports the modification and the total resolution satisfies the statutory criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. CONSOLIDATION COAL
DDATE:
19930326
TTEXT:


Page 2

~551

March 26, 1993

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 92-715 Petitioner : A. C. No. 36-04281-03782 :
v. : Dilworth Mine
:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO MODIFY
ORDER TO PAY

Before: Judge Merlin

The above-captioned case was the subject of an extensive conference call between the undersigned and counsel for both parties on January 28, 1993. On March 1, 1993, the Solicitor filed a motion to approve settlement of the four violations involved in this case. The originally assessed penalties were $1,086 and the proposed settlements are for $937.

In accordance with the conference call discussion, the Solicitor advises that the operator has agreed to pay the origi- nally assessed penalty for two of the violations, Citation Nos. 3699761 and 3679100. The Solicitor requests that the penalties for Citation Nos. 3691011 and 3691019 be reduced and the cita- tions be modified.

Citation No. 3691011 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
75.509 because the operator did not danger and tag a plug for power circuit which was being worked on. The originally assessed penalty was $506 and the proposed settlement is $425. The Solicitor also requested that the citation be modified by reduc- ing the type of injury from fatal to permanently disabling because the voltage was not as great as originally thought. The agreed upon settlement was reached at the January 28 conference call wherein the reasons for the modification and reduction were discussed and approved by the undersigned.

Citation 3691019 was issued for violation of 30 C.F.R.
75.1722 because a crossunder provided for the No. 1 belt was not guarded. The originally assessed penalty was $168 and the proposed settlement is $100. The Solicitor also requested that the citation be modified by deleting the significant and sub- stantial designation. The Solicitor advised that the reason for


Page 3

~552
the modification is foot traffic underneath the belt was unlikely when the belt was moving.

I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case along with the discussions on January 28, and I conclude that the proffered settlements are appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.

In light of the foregoing, the motion for approval of settlements is GRANTED.

It is ORDERED that Citation No. 3691011 be MODIFIED to reduce the type of injury from fatal to permanently disabling.

It is further ORDERED that Citation No. 3691019 be MODIFIED to delete the significant and substantial designation.

It is further ORDERED that the operator pay a penalty of $937 within 30 days of the date of this decision.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Nancy F. Koppleman, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Depart- ment of Labor, 14480 Gateway Building, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104

Daniel E. Rogers, Esq., Consol Inc., Consol Plaza, 1800 Washing- ton Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15241

/gl

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace