Chestnut Ridge Sand (ALJ decision, November 18, 1992)

Chestnut Ridge Sand (FMSHRC PENN 92-696-M): Safety director permitted to represent operator

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 92-696-M
Decided
November 18, 1992
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Interlocutory order, not final
Checked against source
2026-08-15
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1992
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Interlocutory ALJ order, not Commission precedent
The order granted a limited-purpose representative under Commission Rule 3(b)(2). This order did not become final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Check later official FMSHRC history before relying on this order. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Chestnut Ridge Sand, a division of Haines & Kibblehouse, asked to have safety director James F. Sassaman represent it in the proceeding. The Secretary opposed the request, arguing that the case involved an imminent-danger order and that Sassaman lacked sufficient mine-safety experience. Judge Jerold Feldman held that Commission Rule 3(b)(2) did not bar a limited-purpose representative solely because the person lacked mine-safety experience, and granted the motion.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing rule: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.3(b)(2)
  • Outcome: The operator's motion for permission to be represented by James F. Sassaman was granted.
  • Key point: A limited-purpose representative is not barred solely for lacking mine-safety experience.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)


Page 2

~1973

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. PENN 92-696-M
: A.C. No. 36-08120-05504
Complainant :
v. : Chestnut Ridge Sand
:
CHESTNUT RIDGE SAND, :
Respondent :

ORDER

Before: Judge Feldman

The respondent, a division of Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc., (H&K) has filed a motion seeking permission to have Mr. James F. Sassaman represent it in this matter. H&K is a member of the General Building Contractor's Association. Mr. Sassaman is the association's Director of Safety and is reportedly familiar with administrative proceedings as they pertain to safety and health related issues.

The petitioner opposes the respondent's motion on the grounds that Mr. Sassaman should be precluded from serving as representative under Commission rule 3(b)(2) because "he is not experienced or familiar with the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, the Commission's rules of procedure, or Mine Safety issues in general." In this regard, the petitioner asserts that the seriousness and complexity of this case, which involves a 107(a) imminent danger order, requires a representative with mine safety experience.

Rule 3(b)(2) permits the appointment of a representative for the limited purpose of a specific proceeding. The plain language of this section does not preclude a representative solely because the individual has no mine safety experience. Moreover, the petitioner's reliance on the "complexity" of this case as a basis for its opposition is without merit in view of the fact that the respondent's answer admits the occurrence of the violations in issue, and seeks to be heard only on the issues of the degree of negligence and the appropriateness of the penalty assessment.


Page 3

~1974
ACCORDINGLY, the respondent's motion seeking permission for Mr. James F. Sassaman to represent it in this proceeding IS GRANTED.

Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge
(703) 756-5233
Distribution:

John M. Strawn, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 14480 Gateway Bldg., 3535 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Certified Mail)

James F. Sassaman, Director of Safety, Chestnut Ridge Sand Company, 36 S. 18th St., P.O. Box 15959, Philadelphia, PA 19103 (Certified Mail)

/vmy

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace