Hickory Coal Company (ALJ decision, September 23, 1991)
Hickory Coal Company (FMSHRC PENN 90-49): Final order sets $600 penalty in three installments
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A prior decision found that Hickory Coal violated section 103(a) of the Mine Act, and the case remained open for civil-penalty assessment. Judge William Fauver noted that the Department of Justice had obtained a default judgment for unpaid penalties and that the company was discussing a payment schedule. He set a $600 civil penalty for the violation, payable in three monthly installments of $200, with the full remaining balance due immediately if an installment was missed.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): The order identifies a Mine Act violation under 30 U.S.C. § 813(a) but does not state the underlying safety standard.
- Outcome: A $600 civil penalty was ordered in three monthly installments.
- Key point: The final order set a payment schedule for an existing civil-penalty obligation and accelerated the balance upon default.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. HICKORY COAL
DDATE:
19910923
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1521
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
2 Skyline, 10th Floor
5203 Leesburg Pike
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. PENN 90-49
PETITIONER A. C. No. 36-07783-03516 v.
Slope No. 1 Mine
HICKORY COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
FINAL ORDER
Before: Judge Fauver
My decision of July 2, 1991, found that Respondent violated 103(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. This matter has been pending assessment of a civil penalty for the violation.
The record indicates that the Department of Justice has obtained a default judgment against Respondent for the arrearages of unpaid civil penalties referred to in my decision. It appears that Respondent is now exploring with the Justice Department the possibility of a schedule of payments to satisfy the judgment.
Considering the facts of the violation found in this case, Respondent's financial condition, and all the criteria for a civil penalty in 110(i) of the Act, I find that a civil penalty of $600 is appropriate for the violation found in this case.
WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that Respondent shall pay a civil penalty of $600, in three monthly installments of $200 on November 1, 1991, December 1, 1991, and January 1, 1992; provided: if any installment of $200 is not paid when due, the entire remainder of the civil penalty shall become due immediately.
William Fauver
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace