Darmac Associates Corp. (ALJ decision, May 25, 1988)
Darmac Associates Corp. (FMSHRC PENN 88-58-D): Discrimination complaint dismissed after settlement
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1988 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Kenneth J. Pedersen filed a discrimination complaint against Darmac Associates Corp. The company moved to dismiss, stating that the claims had been resolved through a settlement in a related National Labor Relations Board proceeding and that Pedersen consented to dismissal. Pedersen then filed a signed statement withdrawing his discrimination complaint and related appeal. Judge Avram Weisberger dismissed the complaint in the interest of justice under 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11.
Decision snapshot
- Governing rule: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11
- Outcome: The discrimination complaint and related case were dismissed after the complainant withdrew the claims following a settlement.
- Key point: A complainant may withdraw and dismiss a discrimination case after resolving the underlying claims through a related settlement.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
KENNETH PEDERSEN V. DARMAC ASSOC.
DDATE:
19880525
TTEXT:
Page 2
~683
FMSHRC-FCV
MAY 25, 1988
KENNETH J. PEDERSEN,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Complainant
v. Docket No. PENN 88-58-D
DARMAC ASSOCIATES CORP., PITT CD 87-17 Respondent
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Weisberger
On May 6, 1988, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint's complaint on the ground that his claims has been resolved in the settlement of a related proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board. In its Motion Respondent alleged that the Complainant consented to this Motion. On May 6, 1988, the Complainant filed a signed statement in which he indicated as follows "Based upon a resolution of all outstanding claims arising from discharge from DARMAC Associates Corp., I hereby wish to withdraw my discrimination complaint and the appeal pending before you."
Therefore, in the interest of justice, the complaint herein is DISMISSED, and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 29 C.F.R. $ 2700.11.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Mr. Kenneth J. Pedersen, Box 206, R. D. 1, Barnesboro, PA 15714 (Certified Mail)
Stanley R. Geary, Esq., Rose, Schmidt, Hasley & DiSalle, 900 Oliver Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15222-5369 (Certified Mail)
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace