FMSHRC Commission decision Docket PENN 88-21 Decided July 20, 1988 Remanded

Westrick Coal Co.

Westrick Coal Co. (FMSHRC PENN 88-21): Default order vacated and proceeding remanded

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1988, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1988
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Westrick Coal Company failed to timely respond to an administrative law judge's pre-hearing order in a civil penalty proceeding. The ALJ issued a show-cause order, then entered default, dismissed the proceeding, and ordered payment of the assessed penalty after Westrick's mailed response had not yet arrived. The Commission vacated the default order so the judge could consider Westrick's response. The proceeding was remanded for further action.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: None stated in the decision.
  • Outcome: The ALJ's default order was vacated and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.
  • Key point: The Commission required the ALJ to consider a respondent's response before leaving the default dismissal in place.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. WESTRICK COAL
DDATE:
19880720
TTEXT:

           FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
                          WASHINGTON, D.C.
                              July 20, 1988

SECRETARY OF LABOR
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION

 v.               Docket No. PENN 88-21

WESTRICK COAL CO.

BEFORE: Doyle, Lastowka, and Nelson, Commissioners

                ORDER

BY: Doyle, Lastowka, and Nelson, Commissioners

In this civil penalty proceeding respondent Westrick Coal

Company ("Westrick") failed to timely respond to the administrative
law judge's pre-hearing order. Accordingly, on June 30, 1988, the
judge issued an order requiring Westrick to respond by July 11, 1988
or to show cause why the matter should not be dismissed. On July 11,
1988, Westrick, who is acting without an attorney, wrote to the
judge in response to the show cause order. The letter was mailed
on July 13, 1988, but was not received by the judge until July 18,
1988. In the meantime, on July 15, 1988, the judge found Westrick
in default, dismissed the proceeding, and ordered Westrick to pay
the assessed civil penalty. Because his jurisdiction over this matter
had ended with issuance of the default order, the judge forwarded
Westrick's response to the Commission.


Page 2

~873
In order that the judge may consider Westrick's response
to his previous orders, we vacate the judge's default order and
remand for further proceedings.

Distribution

Raymond Westrick
Westrick Coal Company
R.D. 1, Box 457
Patton, Pennsylvania 16668

Judith Horowitz, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U. S. Department of Labor
14480 Gateway Bldg.
3535 Market St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1000
Falls Church, Virginia 22041

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1988. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.