U.S. Steel Mining Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, June 23, 1987)

U.S. Steel Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 87-107): Headlight settlement reduced to $30

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 87-107
Decided
June 23, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

U.S. Steel Mining operated the Cumberland Mine, where MSHA cited a continuous-miner headlight under 30 C.F.R. § 75.503. The Secretary later learned that a third wire grounded the headlight, so the hazard described in the original assessment did not exist. Judge Paul Merlin approved the settlement, modified the citation to a nonserious violation with no likelihood of occurrence, and reduced the assessment from $136 to $30.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.503
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and the operator was ordered to pay $30.
  • Key point: New information showing that a headlight was grounded supported reducing the penalty and gravity finding.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. U.S. STEEL MINING
DDATE:
19870623
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1134

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. PENN 87-107
PETITIONER A.C. No. 36-05018-03643

v. Cumberland Mine

U.S. STEEL MINING COMPANY,
INC.,
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Merlin

The Solicitor has filed a motion to approve settlement for the violation involved in this case. The original assessment was $136 and the proposed settlement is for $30.

The subject citation was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
75.503 because the inspector believed that a headlight on a Jo continuous miner was not maintained according to permissibility standards in that the headlight on the machine was "loose and not making a ground connection." The Solicitor represents that a reduction from the original assessment is warranted, because "subsequent to the issuance of the citation, the Secretary's representative learned that a third wire existed that grounded the headlight; consequently, no hazard existed from the permissibility violation." The citation was then modified to reduce the gravity of the violation to "no likelihood of occurrence."

In light of the information regarding the existence of a third wire that grounded the headlight, I accept the Solicitor's representations and approve the recommended settlement for a nonserious violation.

Accordingly, the motion to approve settlement is GRANTED and the operator is ORDERED TO PAY $30 within 30 days from the date of this decision.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace