U.S. Steel Mining Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, June 23, 1987)
U.S. Steel Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 87-107): Headlight settlement reduced to $30
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
U.S. Steel Mining operated the Cumberland Mine, where MSHA cited a continuous-miner headlight under 30 C.F.R. § 75.503. The Secretary later learned that a third wire grounded the headlight, so the hazard described in the original assessment did not exist. Judge Paul Merlin approved the settlement, modified the citation to a nonserious violation with no likelihood of occurrence, and reduced the assessment from $136 to $30.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.503
- Outcome: The settlement was approved and the operator was ordered to pay $30.
- Key point: New information showing that a headlight was grounded supported reducing the penalty and gravity finding.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. U.S. STEEL MINING
DDATE:
19870623
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1134
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. PENN 87-107
PETITIONER A.C. No. 36-05018-03643
v. Cumberland Mine
U.S. STEEL MINING COMPANY,
INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Merlin
The Solicitor has filed a motion to approve settlement for the violation involved in this case. The original assessment was $136 and the proposed settlement is for $30.
The subject citation was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
75.503 because the inspector believed that a headlight on a Jo continuous miner was not maintained according to permissibility standards in that the headlight on the machine was "loose and not making a ground connection." The Solicitor represents that a reduction from the original assessment is warranted, because "subsequent to the issuance of the citation, the Secretary's representative learned that a third wire existed that grounded the headlight; consequently, no hazard existed from the permissibility violation." The citation was then modified to reduce the gravity of the violation to "no likelihood of occurrence."
In light of the information regarding the existence of a third wire that grounded the headlight, I accept the Solicitor's representations and approve the recommended settlement for a nonserious violation.
Accordingly, the motion to approve settlement is GRANTED and the operator is ORDERED TO PAY $30 within 30 days from the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace