Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company (ALJ decision, April 3, 1987)

Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company (FMSHRC PENN 86-221-D): Discrimination decision reaffirmed and attorney fees ordered

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 86-221-D
Decided
April 3, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Larry Brian Anderson brought a discrimination proceeding against Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company concerning the removal of his employment application from consideration. In an earlier decision, Judge James A. Broderick found that the company violated section 105(c) of the Mine Act and ordered it to reinstate and fairly consider Anderson's application, as well as reimburse reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs. The company submitted evidence that it had reinstated the application and agreed with Anderson's counsel on the fees and costs. In this supplemental decision, the Judge reaffirmed the earlier decision, found compliance with two parts of the prior order, and ordered reimbursement of the agreed attorney fees.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The earlier discrimination decision was reaffirmed, compliance was recognized, and reimbursement of agreed attorney fees was ordered.
  • Key point: The supplemental decision confirmed reinstatement of the application and required payment of the agreed attorney fees.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
LARRY ANDERSON V. CONSOL COAL
DDATE:
19870403
TTEXT:


Page 2

~705

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

LARRY BRIAN ANDERSON,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. PENN 86-221-D v.

CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL
COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION

Appearances: Michael J. Healey, Esq., Healey & Davidson, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Complainant;
Michael R. Peelish, Esq., Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Broderick

On March 5, 1987, I issued my decision in this proceeding in which I determined that Respondent violated section 105(c) of the Act when it removed Complainant's application from consideration for employment at the subject mine.

I ordered Respondent to reinstate Complainant's application and consider it in good faith for openings for which he is qualified without regard to his alleged absentee record at Consol mines and without regard to his alleged reporting of his supervisor's safety violations. I also ordered Respondent to reimburse Complainant for his reasonable attorney fees and costs of litigation.

On March 23, 1987, counsel for Respondent submitted a copy of a memorandum from counsel to the Industrial and Employee Relations Supervisor at the subject mine directing him to reinstate Complainant's application and consider it in good faith for openings for which he is qualified. Counsel stated that the application has been reinstated. Counsel for Respondent further stated that he agreed with Complainant's counsel on the attorney fees and costs of litigation and would pay the agreed amount to Complainant's attorney.

Complainant's attorney has not responded to Respondent's submission.


Page 3

~706
Premises considered, IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The decision issued March 5, 1987, is reaffirmed.

(2) Respondent has complied with order (1) and (3) in said decision.

(3) Respondent shall reimburse Complainant for his attorney fees in the amount agreed upon by counsel.

(4) This decision is final.

James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace