Beth Energy Mines, Inc. (ALJ decision, October 1, 1986)

Beth Energy Mines, Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 86-162): Bleeder-room settlement approved for $125

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
PENN 86-162
Decided
October 1, 1986
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-19

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1986
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Beth Energy Mines was cited under 30 C.F.R. § 75.303(a) because the No. 1 Bleeder Room at Cambria Slope Mine 33 had not been examined within three hours before a shift. The Secretary proposed reducing the penalty from $259 to $125. The motion explained that the ventilation plan's reference to an "adjacent place" was ambiguous, reducing the operator's negligence, and that the room had been checked four hours before the shift with no miners or identified hazards present. Judge Paul Merlin accepted those reasons, approved the settlement, and ordered payment of $125 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.303(a)
  • Outcome: A $125 settlement was approved, reducing the originally assessed $259 penalty.
  • Key point: The judge accepted a lower penalty based on ambiguity in the examination requirement and the stated conditions in the room.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BETH ENERGY MINES
DDATE:
19861001
TTEXT:

~1507

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. PENN 86-162
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 36-00840-03579

v. Cambria Slope Mine 33

BETH ENERGY MINES, INC.,
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO PAY

Before: Judge Merlin

The Solicitor has filed a motion to approve settlement of the one violation involved in this case. The originally assessed penalty was $259. The proposed settlement is for $125.

The Solicitor's motion discusses the violation in light of the six criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Order No. 2688594 was issued for violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.303(a) because the No. 1 Bleeder Room had not been examined within three hours before the start of a shift, as required by the operator's ventilation plan. The Solicitor represents that a reduction in the proposed penalty is justified because both gravity and negligence were less than was originally thought. The ventilation plan required that all active workings and all adjacent places receive preshift examinations. The Solicitor maintains that the No. 1 Bleeder Room was an "adjacent place," while the operator maintains it was not. However, the Solicitor admits that the term "adjacent place" is ambiguous. Therefore, the negligence involved was reduced. The Solicitor also represents that the No. 1 Bleeder Room had been examined four hours before the start of the shift, that no miners, equipment, methane or other hazards were present in the room. Therefore, gravity was reduced.

The representations and recommendations of the Solicitor are accepted.

Accordingly, the motion to approve settlement is GRANTED and the operator is ORDERED TO PAY $125 within 30 days of the date of this decision.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace