Secretary of Labor v. Barnes & Tucker Company (ALJ decision, June 9, 1985)
Secretary of Labor v. Barnes & Tucker Company (FMSHRC PENN 85-56): $150 settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor and Barnes & Tucker Company proposed a $150 settlement of a civil penalty case involving the Lancashire No. 24-B Mine. MSHA acknowledged that its failure-to-abate closure order had been issued in error. Judge Joseph B. Kennedy also found the evidence supporting the underlying violation marginal after discussing the merits with counsel. He approved the settlement, ordered payment of $150 by July 26, 1985, and made dismissal subject to payment. The release is dated June 9, 1985, but refers to a July 1 discussion; its stated dates are inconsistent.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: Not identified in this settlement order.
- Outcome: Settlement approved for $150, with dismissal subject to payment.
- Key point: MSHA acknowledged an erroneous closure order, and the judge found weak evidence for the violation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. BARNES & TUCKER
DDATE:
19850609
TTEXT:
~1053
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. PENN 85-56
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 36-00837-03536
v. Lancashire No. 24-B Mine
BARNES & TUCKER COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Kennedy
This matter is before me on the parties' motion to approve settlement of the captioned matter in the amount of $150.
Based on an independent evaluation and res nova review of the circumstances, I find the settlement proposed is in accord with the purposes and policy of the Act. MSHA admits that issuance of the failure to abate closure order was in error. Further, an exploration of the merits during the course of a teleconference with counsel on July 1, established that the evidence to support the violation was marginal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion be, and hereby is, GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the operator pay the amount of the penalty agreed upon, $150, on or before Friday, July 26, 1985, and that subject to payment the captioned matter be DISMISSED.
Joseph B. Kennedy
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace