Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. U.S. Steel Mining Co., Inc. (ALJ decision, December 14, 1983)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. U.S. Steel Mining Co., Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 82-306): $217 penalty settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1983 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor and U.S. Steel Mining Co., Inc. proposed settling a civil penalty case involving the Cumberland Mine. The agreement called for payment of the original proposed penalties, totaling $217. Judge Paul Merlin found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and approved it. He ordered the company to pay $217 within 30 days. The short order does not identify the underlying safety standards.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None identified in this order.
- Outcome: Settlement approved; $217 payable within 30 days.
- Key point: The judge approved payment of the original proposed penalties after considering the statutory penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. U.S. STEEL MINING
DDATE:
19831214
TTEXT:
~2097
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. PENN 82-306
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 36-05018-03502
v. Cumberland Mine
U. S. STEEL MINING CO., INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Thomas A. Brown, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner Louise Q. Symons, Esq., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Respondent
Before: Judge Merlin
This case is before me upon a Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty under Section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). The Petitioner has made a motion to approve a settlement agreement. Payment of the original penalties of $217 was proposed. At the hearing I determined that the profferred settlement was appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act. I now affirm that determination.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay $217 within 30 days from the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace