Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Shannopin Mining Company (ALJ decision, January 6, 1983)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Shannopin Mining Company (FMSHRC PENN 81-209-D): Relief ordered for unlawful suspension
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1983 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An earlier decision found that Shannopin Mining Company unlawfully suspended miner George Mateleska in violation of the Mine Act's discrimination provision. This final order sets the remedy after the parties submitted proposals. Judge William Fauver assessed an $800 civil penalty and ordered Shannopin to pay Mateleska $392.40 for five days of lost pay and $235.44 for litigation expenses, both with 12 percent annual interest. He also ordered the company to remove references to the suspension from its records and post the earlier decision and this order at the mine for at least 60 days. The judge denied a union motion to intervene.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c), Mine Act discrimination protection.
- Outcome: $800 civil penalty, $627.84 in pay and expenses plus interest, record expungement, and posting ordered.
- Key point: The final order supplies specific monetary and workplace remedies for the previously found unlawful suspension.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. SHANNOPIN MINING
DDATE:
19830106
TTEXT:
~28
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Application for Review
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
of Discrimination
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
APPLICANT Docket No. PENN 81-209-D MSHA Case No. PITT CD 81-10 v.
Shannopin Mine
SHANNOPIN MINING COMPANY,
Sol No. 12874
RESPONDENT
FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT
AND
FINAL ORDER
On November 30, 1982, a decision was entered on the issue of a violation of section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801, et seq. The decision deferred a final order pending submissions from the parties as to the appropriate relief to be granted based on the decision.
FINAL ORDER
Having considered the parties' submissions with respect to a proposed final order, and a post-decision motion by the United Mine Workers of America to intervene for the purpose of submitting a proposed order for relief, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. The UMWA's motion to intervene is DENIED as being untimely and lacking good cause on the merits.
2. The Secretary's proposed supplemental stipulations are APPROVED and hereby INCORPORATED as FURTHER FINDINGS OF FACT in this proceeding.
3. Based on the record as a whole, and on the statutory criteria for assessing a civil penalty for a violation of the Act, Respondent is ASSESSED a civil penalty of $800 for its violation of section 105(c) of the Act as found in the above-mentioned decision; Respondent shall pay such penalty to the Secretary within 30 days from the date of this Order.
4. Respondent shall make payment to George Mateleska in the amount of $392.40, with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum accruing from March 5, 1981, until paid, to compensate him for the 5 days lost pay incurred as a result of Respondent's unlawful suspension of him.
~29
5. Respondent shall make payment to George Mateleska in the amount of $235.44, with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum accruing from December 16, 1981, until paid, to compensate him for his expenses in connection with this litigation.
6. Respondent shall expunge from its records all references to the suspension of George Mateleska which has been found herein to have been a violation of section 105(c) of the Act.
7. Respondent shall post a copy of the decision of November 30, 1982, and a copy of this Order on the mine bulletin board, or at such other conspicuous place where notices are normally posted for employees of the Shannopin Mine, and keep such copies posted, unobstructed and protected from the weather, for a consecutive period of at least 60 days.
WILLIAM FAUVER
JUDGE
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace