Consolidation Coal Company v. Secretary of Labor (ALJ decision, November 5, 1980)
Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC PENN 80-287-R and PENN 80-288-R): Contests withdrawn after enforcement actions changed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1980 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Consolidation Coal contested a citation and an order issued at its Renton Mine. During the hearing, MSHA agreed to change both actions from section 104(d)(1) enforcement measures to section 104(a) citations. The company then asked to withdraw each notice of contest, and Judge Paul Merlin granted both requests. He dismissed the consolidated cases without deciding whether the underlying safety violations occurred. The decision did not assess a penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: No specific mine safety standard is identified in this decision.
- Outcome: Both notices of contest withdrawn and the cases dismissed after MSHA changed the enforcement actions; no penalty assessed.
- Key point: The ruling ended the contests after MSHA changed the citation and order classifications.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
CONSOLIDATION COAL V. SOL (UMWA)
DDATE:
19801105
TTEXT:
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,
Contest of Orders
CONTESTANT
v. Docket No. PENN 80-287-R
Citation No. 840695; 6/2/80
RAY MARSHALL, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
Docket No. PENN 80-288-R
OF LABOR,
Order No. 840699; 6/11/80
RESPONDENT
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA,
Renton Mine
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Duing the course of the inspector's testimony in Penn 80-287-R the parties requested a recess. After the recess the Solicitor advised that MSHA would modify the subject section 104(d)(1) citation to a section 104(a) citation. The operator then moved to withdraw its notice of contest. The motion to withdraw was granted from the bench.
Thereupon Docket No. PENN 80-288-R was consolidated for hearing and decision with PENN 80-287-R. The Solicitor advised that MSHA also would modify the subject section 104(d)(1) order in PENN 80-288-R to a section 104(a) citation. The operator then moved to withdraw its notice of contest with respect to that matter. The motion was granted from the bench.
In light of the foregoing the above-captioned cases are hereby DISMISSED.
Paul Merlin
Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace