Secretary of Labor v. Hanson Aggregates BMC, Inc. (Commission decision, September 14, 2017)

Secretary of Labor v. Hanson Aggregates BMC, Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 2017-35 M): Shutdown-related default reopened

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
PENN 2017-35 M
Decided
September 14, 2017
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-01

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2017, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2017
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Hanson Aggregates did not timely contest a proposed penalty assessment while the cited mine was shut down for business reasons and its workers were laid off. The company said the shutdown prevented management from investigating the citations, interviewing the workforce, and deciding which citations to contest. Records showed that the operation reopened shortly after the assessment became final, and the Secretary did not oppose relief. The Commission treated the failure as excusable neglect, reopened the assessment, and remanded for the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
  • Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for penalty proceedings.
  • Key point: A mine shutdown that prevents an operator from gathering information needed to evaluate citations may support reopening a defaulted assessment.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH  

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)         

v.

HANSON
AGGREGATES BMC, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket
No. PENN 2017-35-M

A.C.
No. 36-09286-414172

BEFORE:    Althen,
Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE
COMMISSION: 

This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.        § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”).  On November 16, 2016, the Commission received from Hanson Aggregates BMC, Inc. (“Hanson Aggregates”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Under
section 105(a), an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment.  If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission.  30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“ JWR ”).  In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief.  See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR , 15 FMSHRC at 787.  We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted.  See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment became a final order of the Commission on August 30, 2016.  Hanson Aggregates asserts that the mine where this citation was issued was shut down for business reasons on June 24, 2016 and the workers were laid off.  During the shutdown, Hanson Aggregates claims it was unable to investigate the citations or interview the workforce.  As a result, management could not make an informed decision as to whether the citations should be contested.

Documents provided by Hanson Aggregates
confirm that the operation was reopened on September 2, 2016.  Hanson Aggregates also alleges that it filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the inspector’s notes, photographs, and other information, but received no response.  The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen.

Having
reviewed Hanson Aggregates request and the
Secretary’s response, we determine that the operator failed to contest this assessment because the operation was shut down when the assessment was issued. As a result the operator failed to collect relevant information to make a determination on which citations to contest.  The operator’s actions are best characterized as excusable neglect.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.  Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order.  See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

/s/ William I. Althen

William I. Althen, Acting Chairman

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

/s/ Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

Distribution:

Ronald
Clister

Area
Health and Safety Manager

2200
Springfield Pike

Connellsville,
PA 15425

W.
Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th St. South, Suite 500

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N

Washington,
DC 20004-1710

Melanie
Garris

Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine
Safety and Health Administration

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th St. South, Suite 500

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace