Secretary of Labor v. LCT Energy, LP (Commission decision, March 27, 2015)
Secretary of Labor v. LCT Energy, LP (FMSHRC PENN 2014-819): Clerical error corrected through reopening
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
LCT Energy missed the deadline to contest part of a proposed penalty assessment because of a clerical error, while timely paying the citations it did not dispute. The company changed its procedures and moved to reopen shortly after receiving a delinquency notice, and the Secretary did not oppose relief. In the interest of justice, the Commission reopened the assessment, remanded for proceedings on the merits, and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b) and 2700.28; 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded for penalty proceedings.
- Key point: A promptly corrected clerical error, coupled with improved filing procedures, can support reopening a final assessment.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004-1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
LCT ENERGY, LP
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No.
A.C. No.
PENN 2014-819
36-09939-342560
BEFORE: Nakamura, Acting Chairman; Cohen and Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY
THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On April 29, 2014, the Commission received from LCT Energy, LP (“LCT”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on February 3, 2014, and became a final order of the Commission on March 5, 2014. LCT asserts that it failed to timely contest the proposed assessment due to a clerical error, and has altered its procedures to ensure that future proposed assessments are timely contested. LCT made timely payment to MSHA for the citations it did not contest, and filed its motion to reopen very shortly after receiving a notice of delinquency. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen.
Having reviewed
LCT’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Acting
Chairman
/s/ Robert F.
Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ William I.
Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace