Secretary of Labor v. Farnham & Pfile Construction, Inc. (Commission decision, May 5, 2014)
Secretary of Labor v. Farnham & Pfile Construction, Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 2013-298): Filing error excused and penalty assessment reopened
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Farnham & Pfile Construction received an MSHA proposed penalty assessment on May 1, 2013, but did not contest it within 30 days, so it became a final Commission order. The company's vice president said his filing error caused the late response on June 27. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but urged the operator to improve its procedures for future contests. The Commission granted relief in the interest of justice, remanded the matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded, with a penalty petition due within 45 days.
- Key point: An acknowledged internal filing error may support reopening when the operator seeks relief promptly and the Secretary does not oppose it.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004-1710
May
5, 2014
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
FARNHAM & PFILE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Docket No. PENN 2013-298
A.C. No. 36-07230-319909 N4A
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young, Cohen, Nakamura, and
Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On July 2, 2013, the Commission received from Farnham & Pfile Construction, Inc. (“Farnham”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an
operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in appropriate
circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to
reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on May 1, 2013, and became a final order of the Commission on May 31, 2013. Farnham’s vice president asserts that due to his filing error, he did not respond to the proposed assessment until June 27, 2013. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen and urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed.
Having reviewed
Farnham’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
Distribution:
Jackson Shoup, Vice Pres.
Farnham & Pfile Construction, Inc.
1200 Maronda Way, Suite 301
Monessen, PA 15062
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace