Central State Aggregates, LLC (Commission decision, March 13, 2012)
Central State Aggregates, LLC (FMSHRC PENN 2010-426): Default vacated after papers went to physical address
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Central State Aggregates did not answer a penalty petition or show-cause order because the papers were sent to the mine's physical address instead of its mailing address. The resulting default became effective in April 2011. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but directed the company to correct its address with MSHA's assessment center. The Commission vacated the default, reopened the proceeding, remanded the case, and required an answer within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
- Outcome: The default was vacated, the case was remanded, and an answer was due within 30 days.
- Key point: Misdelivery caused by an incorrect agency address record supported reopening, but the operator needed to update that record and respond promptly.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
March 13, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
v.
CENTRAL STATE AGGREGATES, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. PENN 2010-426
A.C. No. 36-09604-213741
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On October 17, 2011, the Commission received from Central State Aggregates, LLC (“Central”) a motion submitted by counsel seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the order of default entered against it.
On March 17, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show Cause which by its terms became an Order of Default if the operator did not file an answer within 30 days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Central’s failure to answer the Secretary’s June 16, 2010 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Commission did not receive Central’s answer within 30 days, so the order of default became effective on April 18, 2011.
Central asserts that it did not receive the Order to Show Cause or the Secretary’s previously filed Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty because they were sent to the mine’s physical address, instead of its mailing address. The Secretary does not oppose the motion to reopen, but directs Central to contact the MSHA assessment center to adjust its Legal ID address of record.
Having reviewed Central’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby vacate the Order of Default and reopen the proceeding. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Central shall file an Answer to the Show Cause Order within 30 days of the date of this order.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael F. Duffy
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Denise E. Giraudo, Esq.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
1909 K Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20006
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace