FKZ Coal Inc. (Commission decision, April 5, 2007)

FKZ Coal Inc. (FMSHRC PENN 2007-164): Inability to pay did not justify reopening assessment

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
PENN 2007-164
Decided
April 5, 2007
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-09

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2007, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2007
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

FKZ Coal asked the Commission to reopen a penalty assessment that became final when the company did not contest it within 30 days. The company said it could not pay the assessed penalties but did not explain why it missed the contest deadline. The Secretary opposed reopening because inability to pay was not a recognized ground for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). The Commission denied the request without prejudice because FKZ Coal did not identify mistake, inadvertence, or another valid basis for relief.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b); 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: FKZ Coal’s request to reopen the final penalty assessment was denied without prejudice.
  • Key point: Financial inability to pay does not by itself explain a missed contest deadline or establish a basis for reopening a final assessment.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

April 5, 2007

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

FKZ COAL INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. PENN 2007-164
A.C. No. 36-08637-100333

BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan and Young, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On March 13, 2007, the Commission received from FKZ Coal Inc. (“FKZ Coal”) a letter seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a). The Secretary of Labor filed a response to FKZ Coal’s letter on March 14, 2007.

Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

On October 11, 2006, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued a proposed penalty assessment, A.C. No. 000100333, to FKZ Coal for six citations or orders. In its letter, FKZ Coal states that it is unable to pay the assessments. The company offers no explanation, however, for its failure to timely contest the proposed assessment. In her response, the Secretary states that FKZ Coal “identifies no legally cognizable grounds for requesting reopening” because the company’s “stated reason of not having the money to pay does not meet any of the legal requirements of Rule 60(b)” of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. S. Resp. at 2.

We have held that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of inadvertence or mistake. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787.

Because FKZ Coal’s request for relief does not explain the company’s failure to contest the proposed assessment, and is not based on any of the grounds for relief set forth in Rule 60(b), we hereby deny the request for relief without prejudice. See Marsh Coal Co., 28 FMSHRC 473, 475 (July 2006); Eastern Assoc. Coal, LLC, 28 FMSHRC 999, 1000 (Dec. 2006).

______

Michael F. Duffy, Chairman

______

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

______

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

Distribution

Robert Derck, Foreman

F. K. Z. Coal Inc.

P.O. Box 62

Locust Gap, PA 17840

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor

Arlington, VA 22209

Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty, MSHA

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace