AFGE Council 147 and Social Security Administration (Authority decision, September 11, 1984)
AFGE Council 147 and SSA (FLRA O-NG-976): Incomplete negotiability appeal dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. This is a final order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority dismissing a negotiability petition for failure to meet filing requirements. An aggrieved person may seek judicial review by filing a petition in an appropriate United States court of appeals within 60 days after issuance under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a). Filing a petition does not stay the Authority's order unless the court orders a stay under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(c).
Plain-English summary
AFGE Council 147 filed a negotiability appeal involving the Social Security Administration. The Authority told the union its petition did not comply with a filing requirement, described the steps needed to complete it, and allowed time to respond. The union filed nothing within that period. The Authority dismissed the appeal without deciding any proposal's negotiability.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Negotiability petition under 5 U.S.C. § 7117(c)(2); filing requirement at 5 C.F.R. § 2424.4(b).
- Outcome: Appeal dismissed for failure to cure a filing defect.
- Key point: The union did not complete the appeal after the Authority's notice and deadline.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v16 p27 ]
16:0027(4)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
16 FLRA No. 4
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 147, AFL-CIO
Union
and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Activity
Case No. O-NG-976
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW
This matter is before the Authority on a petition for review of negotiability issues filed by the Union pursuant to section 7117(c)(2) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and section 2424.1 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. By Authority letter dated August 3, 1984, the Union was informed that preliminary examination of the petition for review had disclosed an apparent deficiency in meeting the requirements of the Authority's rules of procedure. Specifically, as was noted in the Authority's letter, the Union's appeal failed to comply with section 2424.4(b) of the Regulations.
The Union was also advised in the Authority's letter that further processing of the appeal was contingent upon compliance with the designated provisions of the Authority's Regulations. In this regard, the Union was informed of the specific actions that had to be taken to comply and complete the appeal, and was afforded time in which to take those actions. Finally, the Union was advised that failure to comply with the cited requirements within the time limit provided could result in dismissal of the appeal.
The Union has made no submission within the time limit provided. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for failure to comply with the Authority's Regulations.
For the Authority.
Issued, Washington, D.C., September 11, 1984 Jan K. Bohren Executive Director/Administrator
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace