Firefighters Local F-37 and Naval Training Center Great Lakes (Authority decision, August 3, 1982)

Great Lakes holiday leave proposal rejected (FLRA O-NG-460)

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
O-NG-460
Decided
August 3, 1982
Outcome
Upheld
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1982, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1982
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. This is a final Authority order. An aggrieved person may seek judicial review by filing a petition in an appropriate United States court of appeals within 60 days after issuance under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a). Filing a petition does not stay the Authority's order unless the court orders a stay under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(c).

Plain-English summary

Firefighters Local F-37 proposed an extra paid day off for an essential employee required to work when the President declared a nonworkday. The Authority held that federal law specifically governed the compensation at issue, placing the matter outside negotiable conditions of employment. It dismissed the petition on the merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(14)(C).
  • Outcome: Holiday leave proposal held nonnegotiable; petition dismissed.
  • Key point: Federal pay law controlled the employee’s holiday compensation.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v09 p729 ]

09:0729(89)NG

The decision of the Authority follows:

9 FLRA No. 89

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE
FIGHTERS, AFL-CIO, LOCAL F-37
Union

and

NAVAL TRAINING CENTER, GREAT
LAKES, ILLINOIS
Agency

Case No. O-NG-460

DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE

THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE AUTHORITY
PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE
LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) AND PRESENTS THE ISSUE
OF THE NEGOTIABILITY OF THE FOLLOWING UNION PROPOSAL.

UNION PROPOSAL /1/

ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE

WHEN A NON-WORKDAY IS PROCLAIMED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER AND PERSONNEL
DESIGNATED ESSENTIAL ARE

REQUIRED TO REPORT FOR DUTY, AN ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE DAY WILL BE
GRANTED TO THE EMPLOYEE

WITHIN . . . FOLLOWING THE NON-WORKDAY. THE ASSIGNED LEAVE DAY WILL
BE AT THE SUPERVISOR'S

DISCRETION. UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD,
INCLUDING THE PARTIES' CONTENTIONS, THE AUTHORITY MAKES THE FOLLOWING
DETERMINATION.

QUESTION BEFORE THE AUTHORITY

THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THE PROPOSAL IS OUTSIDE THE DUTY TO BARGAIN
UNDER THE STATUTE BECAUSE IT CONCERNS A MATTER THAT IS EXCLUDED FROM THE
DEFINITION OF "CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT" UNDER SECTION 7103(A)(14) OF
THE STATUTE. /2/

OPINION

CONCLUSION AND ORDER: THE PROPOSAL CONCERNS A MATTER WHICH IS
"SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR BY FEDERAL STATUTE" UNDER SECTION
7103(A)(14)(C) AND, THEREFORE, IS EXCLUDED FROM "CONDITIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT" WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO THE DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE STATUTE.
ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND
REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.10 (1981)), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR
REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL AT ISSUE IN THE INSTANT CASE BE, AND IT HEREBY
IS, DISMISSED.

REASONS: THE UNION'S PROPOSAL WOULD REQUIRE THAT IF THE PRESIDENT
DECLARES A REGULARLY SCHEDULED WORKDAY TO BE A "NON-WORKDAY" (HOLIDAY),
AN EMPLOYEE WHO MUST REPORT FOR DUTY ON SUCH A HOLIDAY WOULD BE GRANTED
A DAY OF "ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE," I.E., A DAY OFF WITH PAY NOT CHARGED TO
LEAVE, IN ADDITION TO COMPENSATION TO WHICH THE EMPLOYEE WOULD OTHERWISE
BE ENTITLED.

BASED UPON THE RECORD, THE EMPLOYEE INVOLVED IN THIS CASE RECEIVED
PREMIUM PAY COMPENSATION ON AN ANNUAL BASIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. 5545(C)(1).
/3/ THAT SECTION APPLIES TO CERTAIN EMPLOYEES, SUCH AS THOSE INVOLVED
HEREIN, WHO ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT FOR WORK ON HOLIDAYS WHICH FALL
WITHIN THEIR REGULAR WORK SCHEDULES. IN RECOGNITION THEREOF, SUCH
EMPLOYEES RECEIVE PREMIUM PAY ON AN ANNUAL BASIS RATHER THAN BEING
COMPENSATED FOR EACH HOLIDAY WORKED UNDER OTHER PROVISIONS OF TITLE 5.
THAT IS, THE FACT OF THEIR BEING REQUIRED TO REPORT FOR WORK ON HOLIDAYS
IS A FACTOR IN DETERMINING THEIR ENTITLEMENT TO ANNUAL PREMIUM PAY. /4/
THERE IS NO PROVISION OR AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED WEEKLY TOUR OF DUTY-- E.G., TIME
OFF FOR WORK PERFORMED ON A HOLIDAY-- FOR EMPLOYEES WHO ALREADY ARE
RECEIVING ANNUAL PREMIUM PAY PURSUANT TO SECTION 5545(C)(1).

SECTION 7103(A)(14)(C) OF THE STATUTE, DEFINING "CONDITIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT" WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATION, EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES MATTERS
"TO THE EXTENT SUCH MATTERS ARE SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR BY FEDERAL
STATUTE." INASMUCH AS COMPENSATION FOR WORK REQUIRED ON NON-WORKDAYS IS
SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR BY 5 U.S.C. 5545(C)(1) IN DETERMINING ANNUAL
PREMIUM PAY FOR EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN THIS CASE, THE UNION'S PROPOSAL
CONCERNS MATTERS WHICH, UNDER SECTION 7103(A)(14)(C), ARE EXCLUDED FROM
CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATION UNDER THE STATUTE.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, COUNCIL OF FEDERAL
GRAIN INSPECTION LOCALS AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
FEDERAL GRAIN INSPECTION SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D.C., 3 FLRA 530 (1980),
AFFIRMED SUB NOM. AFGE V. FLRA, 653 F.2D 669 (D.C. CIR. 1981). SEE ALSO
ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS, PENNSYLVANIA STATE COUNCIL AND THE
ADJUTANT GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS, COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA, 3 FLRA 50 (1980). ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., AUGUST 3,
1982

RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN

HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER

LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------

/1/ ACCORDING TO THE UNION, THE BLANK SPACE IN ITS PROPOSAL WOULD
DESIGNATE THE PERIOD OF TIME IN WHICH THE LEAVE DAY MUST BE TAKEN, AND
WOULD BE PART OF THE NEGOTIATIONS OVER THIS PROPOSAL.

/2/ SECTION 7103(A)(14)(C) PROVIDES AS FOLLOWS:

SEC. 7103. DEFINITIONS; APPLICATION

(A) FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER--

. . . .

(14) "CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT" MEANS PERSONNEL POLICIES, PRACTICES,
AND MATTERS, WHETHER

ESTABLISHED BY RULE, REGULATION, OR OTHERWISE, AFFECTING WORKING
CONDITIONS, EXCEPT THAT SUCH

TERM DOES NOT INCLUDE POLICIES, PRACTICES AND MATTERS--

. . . .

(C) TO THE EXTENT SUCH MATTERS ARE SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR BY
FEDERAL STATUTE(.)

/3/ 5 U.S.C. 5545(C)(1) PROVIDES AS FOLLOWS:

SEC. 5545. NIGHT, STANDBY, IRREGULAR, AND HAZARDOUS DUTY
DIFFERENTIAL

. . . .

(C) THE HEAD OF AN AGENCY, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE OFFICE OF
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, MAY PROVIDE THAT--

(1) AN EMPLOYEE IN A POSITION REQUIRING HIM REGULARLY TO REMAIN AT,
OR WITHIN THE CONFINES

OF, HIS STATION DURING LONGER THAN ORDINARY PERIODS OF DUTY, A
SUBSTANTIAL PART OF WHICH

CONSISTS OF REMAINING IN A STANDBY STATUS RATHER THAN PERFORMING
WORK, SHALL RECEIVE PREMIUM

PAY FOR THIS DUTY ON AN ANNUAL BASIS INSTEAD OF PREMIUM PAY PROVIDED
BY OTHER PROVISIONS OF

THIS SUBCHAPTER, EXCEPT FOR IRREGULAR, UNSCHEDULED OVERTIME DUTY IN
EXCESS OF HIS REGULARLY

SCHEDULED WEEKLY TOUR. PREMIUM PAY UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH IS
DETERMINED AS AN APPROPRIATE

PERCENTAGE, NOT IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OF SUCH PART OF THE RATE OF
BASIC PAY FOR THE

POSITION AS DOES NOT EXCEED THE MINIMUM RATE OF BASIC PAY FOR GS-10
(OR, FOR A POSITION

DESCRIBED IN SECTION 5542(A)(3) OF THIS TITLE, OF THE BASIC PAY OF
THE POSITION), BY TAKING

INTO CONSIDERATION THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF ACTUAL WORK REQUIRED IN THE
POSITION, THE NUMBER OF

HOURS REQUIRED IN A STANDBY STATUS AT OR WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE
STATION, THE EXTENT TO

WHICH THE DUTIES OF THE POSITION ARE MADE MORE ONEROUS BY NIGHT,
SUNDAY, OR HOLIDAY WORK, OR

BY BEING EXTENDED OVER PERIODS OF MORE THAN 40 HOURS A WEEK, OR OTHER
RELEVANT FACTORS(.)

/4/ ACCORD, COMPTROLLER GENERAL DECISION B-192815 (DEC. 7, 1978).

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace