Pacific Missile Test Center, Point Mugu, California and National Association of Government Employees, Local R12-33 (Authority decision, August 16, 1984)

Pacific Missile Test Center and NAGE Local R12-33 (FLRA O-AR-735): Late exceptions dismissed

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
O-AR-735
Decided
August 16, 1984
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-05

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1984
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority dismissed exceptions to an arbitration award as untimely under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(b). Judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a) generally does not extend to an order involving an arbitral award unless the order involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116.

Plain-English summary

NAGE Local R12-33 filed exceptions to an arbitrator's award involving the Pacific Missile Test Center. The award was dated and apparently mailed on February 13, 1984. Under the applicable filing rules, the exceptions were due by March 19. The union filed on March 22. The Authority dismissed the exceptions as untimely without reviewing the award's merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Deadline for arbitration exceptions under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(b).
  • Outcome: Exceptions dismissed as untimely.
  • Key point: Exceptions filed three days after the deadline could not be considered.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v15 p562 ]

15:0562(119)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

15 FLRA No. 119

PACIFIC MISSILE TEST CENTER,
POINT MUGU, CALIFORNIA
Activity

and

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL R12-33
Union

Case No. O-AR-735

ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS

This case is before the Authority on exceptions to the award of Arbitrator Joseph F. Gentile filed by the Union pursuant to section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and section 2425.1 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. For the reasons stated below, it has been determined that the exceptions must be dismissed as untimely filed.

The Arbitrator's award is dated February 13, 1984, and appears to have been served on the parties by mail on the same day.

Under section 7122(b) of the Statute, as amended, /1/ and section 2425.1 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, as amended, /2/ which amendments are applicable to exceptions pending or filed with the Authority on or after March 2, 1984, and under sections 2429.21 and 2429.22 of the Rules and Regulations, which are also applicable to computation of the time limit here involved, any exceptions to the Arbitrator's award in this case had to be filed with the Authority no later than the close of business on March 19, 1984. However the exceptions were not filed until March 22, 1984. Therefore, the exceptions were untimely filed.

Accordingly, as the Union's exceptions were untimely filed, they are hereby dismissed.

For the Authority.

Issued, Washington, D.C., August 16, 1984
Jan K. Bohren
Executive Director/Administrator

--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------

/1/ Section 7122(b) of the Statute was amended by the Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments Act of 1983 (Pub. L. No. 98-224, Sec. 4, 98 Stat. 47, 48 (1984)) to provide that the 30-day period for filing exceptions to an arbitrator's award begins on the date the award is served on the filing party.

/2/ 49 Fed.Reg. 22623 (1984).

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace