AFGE Local 1533 and Naval Supply Center, Oakland (Authority decision, November 10, 1982)

Oakland Naval Supply arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA O-AR-449)

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
O-AR-449
Decided
November 10, 1982
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1982, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1982
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority resolves exceptions to an arbitral award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1) generally does not extend to orders involving arbitral awards unless an order involves an unfair labor practice under § 7116. This order does not decide an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

AFGE Local 1533 sought Authority review of an arbitration award dated September 13, 1982. Its exceptions were due October 12 but arrived later. The Authority held that the deadline could not be extended or waived and dismissed the exceptions without reviewing the award.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Union exceptions dismissed as untimely.
  • Key point: Late receipt barred arbitration review.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v10 p451 ]

10:0451(77)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

10 FLRA No. 77

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1533
(Union)

and

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL SUPPLY
CENTER, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA
(Activity)

Case No. O-AR-449

ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS

THIS CASE IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF
ARBITRATOR ROBERT C. SHUBERT FILED BY THE UNION PURSUANT TO SECTION
7122(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE AND
SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. FOR THE
REASONS STATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS
MUST BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY FILED.

UNDER SECTION 7122(B) OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2425.1 OF THE
AUTHROITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN
EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS 30 DAYS BEGINNING ON AND INCLUDING
THE DATE OF THE AWARD. ADDITIONALLY, UNDER SECTION 2429.21 OF THE RULES
AND REGULATIONS, ANY SUCH EXCEPTION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE AUTHORITY
BEFORE THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON THE LAST DAY OF THE PRESCRIBED TIME
LIMIT.

THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IN THIS CASE, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S
SUBMISSION, IS DATED SEPTEMBER 13, 1982. THEREFORE, UNDER THE STATUTE
AND THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS HAD TO
BE FILED, I.E., RECEIVED, NO LATER THAN THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON OCTOBER
12, 1982. HOWEVER, THE EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED UNTIL OCTOBER 22,
1982. IN THAT REGARD, AND AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 2429.23(D) OF THE
RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO AN
ARBITRATION AWARD MAY NOT BE EXTENDED OR WAIVED BY THE AUTHORITY.

ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, THEY ARE
HEREBY DISMISSED.

FOR THE AUTHORITY.

ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 10, 1982

JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace