Department of the Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois and National Association of Government Employees, Local R7-23 (Authority decision, May 13, 1982)
Scott Air Force Base arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA O-AR-379)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1982, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. The Authority dismisses untimely exceptions to an arbitration award. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), orders involving arbitral awards are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice. This decision does not state that it involves one.
Plain-English summary
The union challenged an arbitrator's award concerning Scott Air Force Base. The award was dated March 22, 1982, making April 20 the last day for the Authority to receive exceptions under the then applicable 30-day rule. The union used a commercial courier, but delivery occurred on April 21. The Authority held it could not waive or extend the filing limit and dismissed the exceptions without reaching their merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Arbitration exception deadline under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(b).
- Outcome: Union's exceptions dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: A courier delivery after the deadline does not make arbitration exceptions timely.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v08 p536 ]
08:0536(104)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
8 FLRA No. 104
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,
SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS
(Activity)
and
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL R7-23
(Union)
Case No. O-AR-379
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF
ARBITRATOR MILTON O. TALENT FILED BY THE UNION PURSUANT TO SECTION
7122(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE AND
SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS. FOR THE
REASONS STATED BELOW, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS MUST BE DISMISSED AS
UNTIMELY FILED.
UNDER SECTION 7122(B) OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE
AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN
EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS THIRTY DAYS BEGINNING ON AND
INCLUDING THE DATE ON THE AWARD. ADDITIONALLY, UNDER SECTION 2429.1 OF
THE RULES AND REGULATIONS, WHENEVER THE REGULATIONS REQUIRE THE FILING
OF A DOCUMENT, SUCH DOCUMENT MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE AUTHORITY BEFORE
THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON THE LAST DAY OF THE TIME LIMIT.
THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IN THIS CASE, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S
SUBMISSION, IS DATED MARCH 22, 1982. THEREFORE, UNDER THE ABOVE-CITED
PROVISIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE NATIONAL OFFICE OF
THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN APRIL 20, 1982. WHILE IT APPEARS THAT THE
UNION SOUGHT TO ACCOMPLISH TIMELY FILING BY CONTRACTING WITH A
COMMERCIAL COURIER FOR DELIVERY TO THE AUTHORITY, THE EXCEPTIONS WERE
NOT DELIVERED TO THE AUTHORITY UNTIL APRIL 21, 1982. IN THAT REGARD,
THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO WAIVE OR EXTENT THE TIME LIMITS FOR
FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATION AWARDS.
ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, THE
EXCEPTIONS ARE HEREBY DISMISSED.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 13, 1982
JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace