National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1911 (Union) and U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Eugene, Oregon District Office (Activity) (Authority decision, August 31, 1981)

Oregon land office arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA O-AR-270)

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
O-AR-270
Decided
August 31, 1981
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1981
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. This order concerns exceptions to an arbitration award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), such orders are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116; this decision does not state that it involves one.

Plain-English summary

A Bureau of Land Management union filed exceptions to an arbitration award dated July 9, 1981. The filing deadline was August 7, but the Authority received the exceptions on August 14. It held that the deadline could not be extended or waived and dismissed the appeal without reaching the award’s merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Union exceptions dismissed as untimely.
  • Key point: The exception deadline ran from the date of the arbitration award.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v06 p475 ]

06:0475(89)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

6 FLRA No. 89

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1911
(Union)

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, EUGENE,
OREGON DISTRICT OFFICE
(Activity)

Case No. O-AR-270

ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS

ON AUGUST 14, 1981, THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES,
LOCAL 1911 (THE UNION) FILED EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF ARBITRATOR EATON
H. CONANT IN THE INSTANT CASE WITH THE AUTHORITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION
2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R. 2425.1(1980)). FOR THE
REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE SUBJECT
EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(B)(1980)) PROVIDES:

THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS
THIRTY (30) DAYS

BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE AWARD.

THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S SUBMISSION,
IS DATED JULY 9, 1981. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE
AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN AUGUST 7, 1981. HOWEVER, AS STATED
ABOVE, THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL
AUGUST 14, 1981. IN THIS REGARD, THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO
EXTEND OR WAIVE THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATORS'
AWARDS.

ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART
FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE UNION'S APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED.

FOR THE AUTHORITY.

ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., AUGUST 31, 1981

JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace