Ogden Air Logistics Center, Hill Air Force Base, Utah (Activity) and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1592, AFL-CIO (Union) (Authority decision, August 31, 1981)
Hill Air Force Base arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA O-AR-267)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. This order concerns exceptions to an arbitration award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), such orders are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116; this decision does not state that it involves one.
Plain-English summary
A Hill Air Force Base union filed exceptions to an arbitration award dated July 2, 1981. They were due July 31 but were filed on August 3. The Authority said it could not extend or waive the filing period and dismissed the exceptions without reaching the award’s merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
- Outcome: Union exceptions dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: The award date started the thirty day exception period.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v06 p472 ]
06:0472(87)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
6 FLRA No. 87
OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER,
HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH
(Activity)
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1592
(Union)
Case No. O-AR-267
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
ON AUGUST 3, 1981, THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1592 (THE UNION) FILED EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF
ARBITRATOR REED RICHARDSON IN THE INSTANT CASE WITH THE AUTHORITY,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(1981)). FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED
THAT THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED
FOR REVIEW.
SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(B)(1981)) PROVIDES:
THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS
THIRTY (30) DAYS
BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE AWARD.
THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S SUBMISSION,
IS DATED JULY 2, 1981. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE
AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN JULY 31, 1981. HOWEVER, AS STATED ABOVE,
THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL AUGUST 3,
1981. IN THIS REGARD, THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXTEND OR WAIVE
THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATOR'S AWARDS.
ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART
FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE UNION'S APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., AUGUST 31, 1981
JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace