Veterans Administration Medical Center, New York and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2094 (Authority decision, January 29, 1982)

VA Medical Center in New York (FLRA O-AR-238): removal award beyond Authority review

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
O-AR-238
Decided
January 29, 1982
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1982, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1982
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority dismissed the union's exceptions to a removal arbitration award for lack of jurisdiction. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a), the court of appeals review provision generally excludes an Authority order concerning an arbitral award under § 7122 unless it involves an unfair labor practice. This order concerns jurisdiction over a removal award; the Authority identified 5 U.S.C. § 7703 as the route for judicial review of that award.

Plain-English summary

An arbitrator found that a Veterans Administration medical center did not violate its agreement by removing an employee for absence without leave. AFGE Local 2094 filed exceptions to the award with the Authority. The Authority held that 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a) excludes removal awards from its arbitration review jurisdiction because removal is an adverse action covered by § 7121(f) and § 7512. It dismissed the exceptions without reaching the award's merits and said the grievant could seek judicial review of the award under § 7703.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Arbitration review limits under 5 U.S.C. §§ 7121(f) and 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Union exceptions dismissed for lack of Authority jurisdiction.
  • Key point: Removal arbitration awards are reviewed through the route for covered adverse actions, not Authority arbitration exceptions.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v07 p788 ]

07:0788(134)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

7 FLRA No. 134

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
MEDICAL CENTER, NEW YORK, N.Y.
(ACTIVITY)

and

LOCAL NO. 2094, AMERICAN
FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
(UNION)

Case No. O-AR-238

ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF
ARBITRATOR WILLIAM W. WAITE FILED BY THE UNION UNDER SECTION 7122(A) OF
THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C.
7122(A)). IN HIS AWARD, THE ARBITRATOR FOUND THAT THE ACTIVITY DID NOT
VIOLATE THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT WHEN IT REMOVED THE GRIEVANT FROM THE
FEDERAL SERVICE FOR BEING ABSENT WITHOUT LEAVE. FOR THE REASONS THAT
FOLLOW, THE AUTHORITY IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE UNION'S
EXCEPTIONS AND THE EXCEPTIONS THEREFORE MUST BE DISMISSED.

SECTION 7122(A) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART:

EITHER PARTY TO ARBITRATION UNDER THIS CHAPTER MAY FILE WITH THE
AUTHORITY AN EXCEPTION TO

ANY ARBITRATOR'S AWARD PURSUANT TO THE ARBITRATION (OTHER THAN AN
AWARD RELATING TO A MATTER

DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7121(F) OF THIS TITLE).

AS RELEVANT TO THIS CASE, THE MATTERS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 7121(F) OF
THE STATUTE INCLUDE THOSE COVERED UNDER 5 U.S.C. 7512 WHICH, IN TURN,
APPLIES TO SPECIFIED ADVERSE ACTIONS INCLUDING REMOVALS. REVIEW OF AN
ARBITRATION AWARD RELATING TO SUCH MATTERS MUST BE OBTAINED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH 5 U.S.C. 7703, I.E., IN THE SAME MANNER AND UNDER THE
SAME CONDITIONS AS IF THE MATTER INVOLVED HAD BEEN DECIDED BY THE MERIT
SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD. (5 U.S.C. 7703 PROVIDES FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
OF FINAL DECISIONS OF THE MSPB.)

SINCE THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD RELATES TO A MATTER COVERED BY 5 U.S.C.
7512, I.E., THE REMOVAL OF THE GRIEVANT, UNDER SECTION 7122(A) OF THE
STATUTE, EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD MAY NOT BE FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE AUTHORITY IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE
UNION'S EXCEPTIONS. RATHER, THE GRIEVANT MAY SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW OF
THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD PURSUANT TO 5 U.S.C. 7703.

ACCORDINGLY, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, IT IS ORDERED THAT
THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS BE, AND THEY HEREBY ARE, DISMISSED.

FOR THE AUTHORITY.

ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 29, 1982

JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace