Massachusetts Port Authority (Board decision, July 31, 2025)

In re Massachusetts Port Authority (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 23-03): petition dismissed after settlement

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
NPDES 23-03
Decided
July 31, 2025
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2025, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the appeal. The Board dismissed Massachusetts Port Authority's petition for review after the parties reached a settlement and completed the related permit modification process. The full text below is the official EPA release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Massachusetts Port Authority petitioned the Environmental Appeals Board to review provisions of an NPDES permit issued by EPA Region 1. The parties participated in the Board's Alternative Dispute Resolution program, entered into a Settlement Agreement, and completed the permit modification process described in that agreement. Massport and EPA Region 1 then filed a joint motion to dismiss under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(k). The Board granted the request and dismissed the petition without deciding the merits of the permit provisions.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(k)
  • Outcome: The petition for review was dismissed after the parties reached a settlement and completed the related permit modification process.
  • Key point: A permit appeal may be dismissed after a settlement resolves the challenged provisions and the agreed permit modifications are complete.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

F I L E D
Jul 31, 2025
Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD INITIALS ______ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.

)
)
In re Massachusetts Port Authority
)
) NPDES Appeal No. 23-03
NPDES Permit No. MA0000787
)
)
)

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

The Massachusetts Port Authority (“Massport”) petitioned the Environmental Appeals

Board to review certain provisions of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit,

which EPA Region 1 issued to Massport. Following the parties’ participation in the Board’s

Alternative Dispute Resolution program, Massport and EPA Region 1 have filed a Joint Motion

to Dismiss under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(k) requesting dismissal of the petition. Joint Motion to

Dismiss, at 1-2 (July 30, 2025) (explaining that the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement

and that the permit modification process described in the Settlement Agreement is now

complete).

Based on the Joint Motion to Dismiss and the representations contained therein, the

Environmental Appeals Board dismisses the petition for review.

So ordered.1

1
The panel deciding this matter is composed of Environmental Appeals Judges Mary Kay Lynch and Ammie Roseman-Orr.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

July 31, 2025
Dated: ____ By: ______ Mary Kay Lynch
Environmental Appeals Judge

-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the matter of Massachusetts Port Authority, NPDES Appeal No. 23-03, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Email:

For Massachusetts Port Authority:
For U.S. EPA Region 1:
Colin G. Van Dyke, Esq.
Erin Flannery-Keith, Esq.
Carlos R. Rosende, Esq.
Megan Edwards, Esq.
Anderson & Kreiger LLP
U.S. EPA, Region 1
50 Milk Street, 21st Floor
5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
Boston, MA 02109
Boston, MA 02109
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

For Co-Permittees:
Richard S. Davis, Esq.
Beveridge & Diamond PC
1900 N Street, Suite 100
Washington, DC 20036
[email protected]

Jul 31, 2025
Dated: ____
_
________
Tommie Madison
Clerk of the Board

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace