Massachusetts Port Authority (Board decision, July 31, 2025)
In re Massachusetts Port Authority (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 23-03): petition dismissed after settlement
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2025, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Massachusetts Port Authority petitioned the Environmental Appeals Board to review provisions of an NPDES permit issued by EPA Region 1. The parties participated in the Board's Alternative Dispute Resolution program, entered into a Settlement Agreement, and completed the permit modification process described in that agreement. Massport and EPA Region 1 then filed a joint motion to dismiss under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(k). The Board granted the request and dismissed the petition without deciding the merits of the permit provisions.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(k)
- Outcome: The petition for review was dismissed after the parties reached a settlement and completed the related permit modification process.
- Key point: A permit appeal may be dismissed after a settlement resolves the challenged provisions and the agreed permit modifications are complete.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
F I L E D
Jul 31, 2025
Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD INITIALS ________________________
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
)
In re Massachusetts Port Authority )
) NPDES Appeal No. 23-03
NPDES Permit No. MA0000787 )
)
)
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW
The Massachusetts Port Authority (“Massport”) petitioned the Environmental Appeals
Board to review certain provisions of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit,
which EPA Region 1 issued to Massport. Following the parties’ participation in the Board’s
Alternative Dispute Resolution program, Massport and EPA Region 1 have filed a Joint Motion
to Dismiss under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(k) requesting dismissal of the petition. Joint Motion to
Dismiss, at 1-2 (July 30, 2025) (explaining that the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement
and that the permit modification process described in the Settlement Agreement is now
complete).
Based on the Joint Motion to Dismiss and the representations contained therein, the
Environmental Appeals Board dismisses the petition for review.
So ordered.1
1
The panel deciding this matter is composed of Environmental Appeals Judges Mary
Kay Lynch and Ammie Roseman-Orr.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
July 31, 2025
Dated: ____ By: ______
Mary Kay Lynch
Environmental Appeals Judge
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the matter
of Massachusetts Port Authority, NPDES Appeal No. 23-03, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:
By Email:
For Massachusetts Port Authority: For U.S. EPA Region 1: Colin G. Van Dyke, Esq. Erin Flannery-Keith, Esq. Carlos R. Rosende, Esq. Megan Edwards, Esq. Anderson & Kreiger LLP U.S. EPA, Region 1 50 Milk Street, 21st Floor 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109 Boston, MA 02109 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
For Co-Permittees:
Richard S. Davis, Esq.
Beveridge & Diamond PC
1900 N Street, Suite 100
Washington, DC 20036
[email protected]
Jul 31, 2025
Dated: ____ _________
Tommie Madison
Clerk of the Board
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace