City of Rochester, New Hampshire (Board decision, March 29, 2024)
In re City of Rochester, New Hampshire (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 23-01): petition dismissed after withdrawal
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The City of Rochester, New Hampshire, petitioned the Environmental Appeals Board to review its NPDES permit, which was identified as Permit No. NH0100668. On March 28, 2024, the City filed a notice withdrawing its petition. The City stated that the parties had executed an agreement for an Administrative Order on Consent addressing the total phosphorus limit and a schedule for upgrades at the City's wastewater treatment facility. The Board dismissed the petition based on the filing and the representations it contained.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 124.19
- Outcome: The petition was dismissed after the City withdrew it while the parties pursued an Administrative Order on Consent.
- Key point: An EAB permit appeal may be dismissed when the petitioner withdraws it in connection with an agreement resolving the contested issues.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
F I L E D
Mar 29, 2024
Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS ________________________
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
)
In re City of Rochester, New Hampshire ) NPDES Appeal No. 23-01
)
NPDES Permit No. NH0100668
)
)
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW
On March 28, 2024, the City of Rochester, New Hampshire, filed a notice withdrawing
its petition for review in this matter. In support of its filing, the City states that the parties have
executed an agreement for an Administrative Order on Consent that will resolve the contested
issues in the appeal, “specifically the total phosphorus limit and a schedule for implementation of
necessary upgrades at the City’s wastewater treatment facility.” City of Rochester Notice of
Withdrawal of Petition for Review at 2 (March 28, 2024). The City further states that its notice
is consistent with the terms of a July 21, 2023 agreement between the parties to engage in
continued settlement negotiations towards resolution of outstanding issues. Id. at 1-2.
In light of the City’s filing and the representations contained therein, the Environmental
Appeals Board dismisses the City’s petition for review.
So ordered. 1
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Dated: March 29, 2024 By: ________
Aaron P. Avila
Environmental Appeals Judge
1
The two-member panel deciding this matter is composed of Environmental Appeals
Judges Aaron P. Avila and Wendy L. Blake.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the matter
of City of Rochester, New Hampshire, NPDES Appeal No. 23-01, were sent to the following
persons in the manner indicated:
By Email:
For: City of Rochester
Sherilyn Burnett Young
James J. Steinkrauss
Craig Thomas McMahon
Rath, Young and Pignatelli, P.C.
One Capital Plaza
Concord, New Hampshire 03302-1500
Tel. (603) 226-2600
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
For: EPA Region 1
Michael Knapp
Senior Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1
5 Post Office Square, Suite 100
Mail Code: 4-02
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Tel. (617) 918-1053
[email protected]
Dated: ____
Mar 29, 2024 ______
Emilio Cortes
Clerk of the Board
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace