City of Sandpoint Wastewater Treatment Plant (Board decision, January 11, 2018)

In re City of Sandpoint Wastewater Treatment Plant (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 17-06): phosphorus-limit challenge dismissed as moot

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
NPDES 17-06, ID0020842
Decided
January 11, 2018
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2018
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the appeal. The Board dismissed with prejudice the challenge to the phosphorus effluent limits after EPA Region 10 withdrew those limits under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(j). The order preserved the right to seek review of future EPA action on the permit. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA Region 10 reissued an NPDES permit for the City of Sandpoint Wastewater Treatment Plant in Idaho. The Idaho Conservation League challenged the phosphorus effluent limits, arguing that the Region used a mixing-zone policy that was not included in Idaho's EPA-approved water-quality standards. The Region later withdrew the disputed limits because it had not considered earlier comments on the mixing-zone issue and planned to prepare new permit conditions. The Board dismissed the appeal with prejudice as moot. The dismissal did not prevent a future petition for review of new EPA action on the permit.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(a) and § 124.19(j)
  • Outcome: The challenge to the phosphorus effluent limits was dismissed with prejudice after EPA withdrew those limits.
  • Key point: Withdrawal of disputed permit provisions can moot an EAB appeal, while future agency action remains subject to the applicable review process.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

                     BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
               UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                              WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re: )
)
City of Sandpoint ) NPDES Appeal No. 17-06
Wastewater Treatment Plant )
)
NPDES Permit No. ID0020842 )

              ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW AS MOOT

On September 5, 2017, Region 10 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reissued NPDES Permit No. ID0020842 to the City of Sandpoint, Idaho. The permit authorizes the City of Sandpoint Wastewater Treatment Plant to discharge treated wastewater to the Pend Oreille River, a regulated water of the United States, subject to certain effluent limits and conditions.

On October 6, 2017, the Idaho Conservation League ("ICL") filed a petition for review of Permit No. ID0020842 with the Environmental Appeals Board ("Board"), pursuant to EPA permitting regulations at 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(a). In its petition, ICL challenged the Region's decision, in establishing phosphorus effluent limits for City of Sandpoint discharges, to employ a mixing zone policy that was not included in Idaho's EPA-approved state water quality standards.

On October 26, 2017, the Region sought and subsequently received an extension of time to file a response to ICL's petition for review. See Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Review (EAB Oct. 30, 2017) (extending response deadline to January 16, 2018). On January 9, 2018, the Region filed a notice with the Board withdrawing the disputed phosphorus limits pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(j). The Region stated that it failed to consider comments ICL had previously submitted on the mixing zone issue but that it intends to do so now. The Region stated that it will then clarify the basis for establishing a mixing zone, if appropriate, modify, if necessary, the phosphorus limits, and prepare new draft permit conditions to replace the withdrawn provisions. The Region will provide notice and an opportunity for the public to comment on the new permit decision. In the meantime, the other provisions of the City of Sandpoint's prior NPDES permit will remain in effect.

The Region filed a companion motion on January 9, 2017, to dismiss ICL's petition for review of NPDES Permit No. ID0020842. In its motion, the Region points out that at any time prior to thirty days after the filing of a response brief, the Region has authority to withdraw part or all of a final permit decision and prepare a new draft permit addressing the portions so withdrawn, provided appropriate prior notice of withdrawal is given. See 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(j). In this case, the Region contends that its withdrawal of the disputed phosphorus limits has rendered ICL's appeal of those limits moot, and thus it requests that the Board dismiss the pending petition for review. The Region reports that it contacted ICL in December and determined that ICL does not object to the Board's granting of the motion to dismiss.

For good cause shown, ICL's appeal of the phosphorus effluent limits is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This dismissal with prejudice has no effect on ICL's right to petition the Board for review of future EPA action with respect to NPDES Permit No. ID0020842 in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 124.19.

So ordered.

                          ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: January 11, 2018 By: Kathie A. Stein
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge

                     CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review as Moot in the matter of City of Sandpoint Wastewater Treatment Plant, NPDES Appeal No. 17- 06, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Facsimile and First Class U.S. Mail:

Matthew Nykiel
Conservation Associate
Idaho Conservation League
Post Office Box 2308
Sandpoint, Idaho 83864
telephone: (208) 265-9565
facsimile: (208) 265-9650
e-mail: [email protected]

By Facsimile and EPA Pouch Mail:

Courtney Weber
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900
Mail Code ORC 113
Seattle, Washington 98101
telephone: (206) 553-1477
facsimile: (206) 553-1762
e-mail: [email protected]

Dated: JAN 11 2018
Annette Duncan
Administrative Specialist

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace