Invensys Systems, Inc. (Board decision, April 21, 2016)

In re Invensys Systems, Inc. (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 15-10): petition dismissed after settlement

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
NPDES 15-10, MA0004120
Decided
April 21, 2016
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2016, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2016
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the appeal. In light of the parties' settlement concerning an administrative order to comply with the permit, the Board dismissed the appeal in its entirety with prejudice. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Invensys Systems, Inc. petitioned for review of NPDES Permit No. MA0004120, issued by EPA Region 1. The parties later settled their differences by agreeing to an administrative order requiring compliance with the permit. The Board granted their joint request and dismissed the appeal in its entirety with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 1.25(e)(1)
  • Outcome: The NPDES appeal was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice after settlement.
  • Key point: A settlement that resolves a permit challenge through an administrative compliance order can support dismissal of the appeal.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

F I L E D

APR 21 2016

Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS [illegible]

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re:

Invensys Systems, Inc.

NPDES Appeal No. 15-10

NPDES Permit No. MA0004120

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

On September 4, 2015, Invensys Systems, Inc. (“Invensys”) filed a petition for review

challenging a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (“Permit”) issued to it on

July 17, 2015, by Region 1 (“Region”) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The

parties subsequently requested and the Environmental Appeals Board (“Board”) issued several

orders staying proceedings in this appeal to allow the parties to discuss settlement.

On April 19, 2016, Invensys and the Region filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal.

The parties report that they have settled their differences by agreeing on the terms of an

administrative order to comply with the Permit. The parties jointly seek dismissal of the appeal

in its entirety, with prejudice.

In light of the parties’ settlement of this appeal, the Board grants the parties’ request and

dismisses NPDES Appeal No. 15-10 in its entirety, with prejudice.

So ordered.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD¹

Dated: 4/21/2016

By: [signature]
Mary Beth Ward
Environmental Appeals Judge

¹ The panel deciding this matter is comprised of Environmental Appeals Judges
Mary Kay Lynch, Kathie Stein, and Mary Beth Ward. See 40 C.F.R. § 1.25(e)(1).

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in
the matter of Invensys Systems, Inc., NPDES Appeal No. 15-10, were sent to the following
persons in the manner indicated:

By Facsimile and First Class U.S. Mail:

Seth D. Jaffe, Esq.
Jesse Harlan Alderman, Esq.
Foley Hoag LLP
Seaport World Trade Center West
155 Seaport Boulevard
Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2600
telephone: (617) 832-1000
facsimile: (617) 832-7000

By Facsimile and EPA Pouch Mail:

Paul Schwartz, Esq.
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Mail Code 9T25
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960
telephone: (404) 562-9576
facsimile: (404) 562-9486

Date: APR 21 2016

[signature]
Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace