Bacardi Corporation (Board decision, August 5, 2008)

In re Bacardi Corporation (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 08-07): permit appeal dismissed after withdrawal

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
NPDES 08-07, PR0000591
Decided
August 5, 2008
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2008
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the permit appeal. The Board granted Bacardi Corporation’s motion to withdraw its petition for review and dismissed the petition with prejudice after Bacardi reported that a consent decree addressed the contested permit conditions. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Bacardi Corporation appealed conditions in NPDES Permit No. PR0000591. Bacardi moved to withdraw the appeal after entering a consent decree with EPA Region 2 and the U.S. Department of Justice. The consent decree was lodged with the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and addressed the permit conditions contested in the appeal. EPA concurred in the withdrawal, and the Board dismissed the petition for review with prejudice.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the order.
  • Outcome: The motion to withdraw the appeal was granted, and the petition for review was dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: A consent decree resolving the contested permit conditions supported dismissal of the permit appeal.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

                   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
                UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                              WASHINGTON, DC

                                  )

In re: )
)
Bacardi Corporation ) NPDES Appeal No. 08-07
)
NPDES Permit No. PR0000591 )
)

             ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL

  On August 4, 2008, the petitioner in the above-captioned matter, Bacardi Corporation

(“Bacardi”), moved to withdraw its petition for review filed with the Environmental Appeals Board. Motion for Withdrawal of Appeal (Aug. 1, 2008) (“Motion”). Bacardi states that it entered into a consent decree with the permitting authority, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Region 2, and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and that the consent decree, lodged with the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico on July 31, 2008, addresses the permit conditions contested in the appeal. Id. Bacardi states further that EPA concurs in the Motion. Id.

  Under these circumstances, the above-captioned petition for review is hereby dismissed

with prejudice.

  So ordered.

                                  ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: August 5, 2008 By: [signature]
Edward E. Reich
Environmental Appeals Judge

                          CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

  I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Granting Motion for Withdrawal of

Appeal in Bacardi Corporation, NPDES Appeal No. 08-07, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

First Class Mail: Eduardo Negrón Navas
Fiddler González & Rodríguez, P.S.C.
P.O. Box 363507
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-3507

                                      John Fehrenback
                                      Winston & Strawn LLP
                                      1700 K Street, N.W.
                                      Washington, D.C. 20006-3817

EPA Pouch Mail: Diane Gomes
U.S. EPA, Region 2
Office of Regional Counsel
290 Broadway, 16th Floor
New York, NY 10007

Date: AUG - 5 2008

[signature]
Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace