Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility (Board decision, February 28, 2008)
In re Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 08-01): petition dismissed as moot
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
EPA Region 1 issued an NPDES permit for the Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility in Bradford, Massachusetts. The City of Haverhill petitioned for review of nitrogen monitoring requirements in the permit. EPA later withdrew the challenged conditions and moved to dismiss the petition. The Environmental Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot. The order does not state a penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. pt. 124.
- Outcome: The petition for review was dismissed as moot after the challenged permit conditions were withdrawn.
- Key point: Withdrawal of the challenged permit conditions made the petition moot.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
In re:
Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility NPDES Appeal No. 08-01
Permit No. MA0101621
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW
On December 5, 2007, Region 1 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. MA0101621 to the City of Haverhill, located in Bradford, Massachusetts, to discharge pollutants from its wastewater treatment facility into the Merrimack River Basin (the "permit"). On January 3, 2008, the City of Haverhill filed a petition for review with the Environmental Appeals Board ("Board") under the provisions of 40 C.F.R. pt. 124, seeking review of the nitrogen monitoring requirements in the permit.
On February 21, 2008, the Region filed a notice of contested and uncontested conditions
and of withdrawal of permit conditions. Specifically, the Region withdrew the permit's monitoring requirements for Total Ammonia Nitrogen, as N, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total Nitrate and Total Nitrite (collectively referred to as "Nitrogen monitoring requirements").
With the challenged permit conditions withdrawn, the Region moved to dismiss the
petition for review on the grounds of mootness and requested that the Board stay its requirement that the Region produce and submit a written portion of the administrative record, pending the Board's decision on the motion to dismiss. In its motion, the Region represents that the City of Haverhill has consented to the Region's request to dismiss the petition.
Under the circumstances, with the challenged permit conditions now withdrawn, the
Board dismisses Haverhill's petition as moot.
So ordered.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Dated: [illegible] [signature]
Annette Duncan, Environmental Appeals Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the
matter of City of Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility, NPDES Appeal No. 08-01, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:
By Pouch Mail and via fax:
Jonathan Binder
Office of Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA, Region 1
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (RAA)
Boston, MA 02114
Fax #: (617) 918-0071
Phone #: (617) 918-1071
By First Class Mail Postage Prepaid
and via fax:
Facility Manager
City of Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility
40 South Porter Street
Haverhill, MA 01835-7646
Fax #: (978) 521-4083
Phone #: (978) 314-2382
[illegible]
Dated: [illegible] Annette Duncan
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace