Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility (Board decision, February 28, 2008)

In re Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 08-01): petition dismissed as moot

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
NPDES 08-01, MA0101621
Decided
February 28, 2008
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2008
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the NPDES appeal. Under 40 C.F.R. § 22.30(f), the Board's decision on review is a final order. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA Region 1 issued an NPDES permit for the Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility in Bradford, Massachusetts. The City of Haverhill petitioned for review of nitrogen monitoring requirements in the permit. EPA later withdrew the challenged conditions and moved to dismiss the petition. The Environmental Appeals Board dismissed the petition as moot. The order does not state a penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. pt. 124.
  • Outcome: The petition for review was dismissed as moot after the challenged permit conditions were withdrawn.
  • Key point: Withdrawal of the challenged permit conditions made the petition moot.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

               BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                          WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re:

Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility NPDES Appeal No. 08-01

Permit No. MA0101621

                         ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW


      On December 5, 2007, Region 1 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit No. MA0101621 to the City of Haverhill, located in Bradford, Massachusetts, to discharge pollutants from its wastewater treatment facility into the Merrimack River Basin (the "permit"). On January 3, 2008, the City of Haverhill filed a petition for review with the Environmental Appeals Board ("Board") under the provisions of 40 C.F.R. pt. 124, seeking review of the nitrogen monitoring requirements in the permit.

      On February 21, 2008, the Region filed a notice of contested and uncontested conditions

and of withdrawal of permit conditions. Specifically, the Region withdrew the permit's monitoring requirements for Total Ammonia Nitrogen, as N, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total Nitrate and Total Nitrite (collectively referred to as "Nitrogen monitoring requirements").

      With the challenged permit conditions withdrawn, the Region moved to dismiss the

petition for review on the grounds of mootness and requested that the Board stay its requirement that the Region produce and submit a written portion of the administrative record, pending the Board's decision on the motion to dismiss. In its motion, the Region represents that the City of Haverhill has consented to the Region's request to dismiss the petition.

      Under the circumstances, with the challenged permit conditions now withdrawn, the

Board dismisses Haverhill's petition as moot.

      So ordered.


                                  ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: [illegible] [signature]
Annette Duncan, Environmental Appeals Judge

                          CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

  I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the

matter of City of Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility, NPDES Appeal No. 08-01, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Pouch Mail and via fax:

          Jonathan Binder
          Office of Regional Counsel
          U.S. EPA, Region 1
          One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (RAA)
          Boston, MA 02114
          Fax #: (617) 918-0071
          Phone #: (617) 918-1071

By First Class Mail Postage Prepaid
and via fax:

          Facility Manager
          City of Haverhill Wastewater Treatment Facility
          40 South Porter Street
          Haverhill, MA 01835-7646
          Fax #: (978) 521-4083
          Phone #: (978) 314-2382


        [illegible]

Dated: [illegible] Annette Duncan

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace