Easley Combined Utilities (Board decision, August 24, 2007)

In re Easley Combined Utilities (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 06-10): petition dismissed after settlement

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
NPDES 06-10, SC0039853
Decided
August 24, 2007
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2007, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2007
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the NPDES permit appeal. The Board dismissed the petition with prejudice after EPA issued a final permit incorporating the changes agreed to in settlement and Easley Combined Utilities withdrew its appeal. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Easley Combined Utilities appealed an NPDES permit issued by EPA Region 4. The Region later issued a final permit incorporating the changes agreed to in settlement of the appealed issues. Easley withdrew its appeal, and the Environmental Appeals Board dismissed the petition for review with prejudice. The order does not state a penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the release.
  • Outcome: The petition for review was dismissed with prejudice after settlement and withdrawal.
  • Key point: A permit appeal can end with prejudice after the permitting Region incorporates settlement changes into a final permit and the petitioner withdraws the appeal.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

             BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
         UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                         WASHINGTON, D.C.
                                                                             AUG 24 2007
                                                                             Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
                                                                             INITIALS

In re:

Easley Combined Utilities NPDES Appeal No. 06-10

NPDES Permit No. SC0039853

                   ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

     On August 20, 2007, Region IV of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency filed a

status report and motion to dismiss in the above-captioned case. The Region reports that on
August 9, 2007, it issued a final NPDES permit incorporating all the changes agreed to in
settlement of the issues appealed by Easley Combined Utilities, permittee and petitioner. On
August 22, 2007, Easley filed a notice of withdrawal of its appeal of the NPDES permit.

     We therefore DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE the pending petition for review,

designated NPDES Appeal No. 06-10.

     So ordered.

                                    ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

                                    By: [signature]
                                    Kathie A. Stein
                                    Environmental Appeals Judge


                          CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

  I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the

matter of Easley Combined Utilities, NPDES Appeal No. 06-10, were sent to the following
persons in the manner indicated:

By Facsimile and First Class U.S. Mail:

  F. Paul Calamita, Esq.
  Richard H. Sedgley, Esq.
  Aqualaw P.L.C.
  801 East Main Street
  Richmond, Virginia 23219
  telephone: (804) 716-9021
  facsimile: (804) 716-9022

By Facsimile and EPA Pouch Mail:

  Philip G. Mancusi-Ungaro, Esq.
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV
  Atlanta Federal Center
  61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
  Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960
  telephone: (404) 562-9519
  facsimile: (404) 562-9486

Dated: AUG 24 2007
Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace