Boston & Maine Corporation (Board decision, August 31, 2006)

In re Boston & Maine Corporation (EAB NPDES Appeal No. 05-17): petition dismissed after permit modification

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
NPDES 05-17, MA0000272
Decided
August 31, 2006
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2006, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2006
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the NPDES permit appeal. The Board dismissed the petition with prejudice after the petitioners reported that the issues raised in the appeal had been resolved by a permit modification. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Jamison Colburn and the Connecticut River Watershed Council voluntarily dismissed their petition challenging Boston & Maine Corporation's NPDES permit. They told the Environmental Appeals Board that the issues raised in the petition had been resolved through a permit modification. The Board dismissed the petition with prejudice. The order does not state the modification's terms or a penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the released order.
  • Outcome: The petition was voluntarily dismissed after a permit modification and dismissed with prejudice.
  • Key point: A permit modification resolving the issues raised in an appeal can support a final dismissal with prejudice.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re: )
Boston & Maine Corporation ) NPDES Appeal No. 05-17
East Deerfield Massachusetts )
)
NPDES Permit No. MA0000272 )

                   ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW

By submission filed on August 17, 2006, Petitioners Jamison Colburn and Connecticut River Watershed Council state that they are “voluntarily dismissing” their Petition for Review in the above-captioned matter. See Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. The Petitioners explain that the issues they raised in their Petition for Review have been resolved by a permit modification.

Accordingly, the Petition for Review is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

So ordered.

                                         ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: August 31, 2006 By:

Environmental Appeals Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review in the matter of Boston & Maine Corporation, NDPES Appeal No. 05-17, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By First Class Mail:

Professor Jamison Colburn
WNEC-Law School
1215 Wilbraham Rd.
Springfield, MA 01119-2654

Andrea Donlon
River Steward
Connecticut River Watershed Council, Inc.
15 Bank Row
Greenfield, MA 01301

John P. Curtin, Esq.
Boston & Maine Corporation
Iron Horse Park, High Street
North Billerica, MA 01862

By Pouch Mail:

Ronald A. Fein, Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA Region I
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (RAA)
Boston, MA 02114

Date: AUG 31 2006

Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace