Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant (Board decision, August 23, 2006)

In re Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant (EAB NPDES Appeal Nos. 05-01 and 05-02): petitions dismissed and one issue stayed

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
NPDES 05-01, NPDES 05-02, DC0021199
Decided
August 23, 2006
Outcome
Mixed result
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2006, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2006
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of two consolidated NPDES permit appeals, except for one issue that the Board stayed. The Board dismissed both petitions with prejudice in their entireties except for the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority's outstanding compliance-schedule issue, which it stayed until February 20, 2007. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA Region 3 withdrew the disputed parts of the Blue Plains NPDES permit issued to the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority. Friends of the Earth and the Sierra Club agreed to dismissal of their petition, and WASA agreed to dismissal of its petition except for a challenge concerning a compliance schedule for its combined sewer overflow plan. The Environmental Appeals Board dismissed the petitions with prejudice except for that one issue, which it stayed for 180 days. The order preserved the parties' rights to comment on future permit revisions and challenge later EPA action.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. §§ 124.5, 124.11, 124.19(d), and 122.62.
  • Outcome: Both petitions were dismissed with prejudice except for WASA's compliance-schedule issue, which was stayed until February 20, 2007.
  • Key point: Withdrawal of challenged permit terms can resolve most appeal issues while leaving a discrete remaining issue stayed for further developments.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re: )
)
Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant ) NPDES Appeal Nos. 05-01
) and 05-02
NPDES Permit No. DC0021199 )

                  ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
                          AND STAYING ONE ISSUE

On August 11, 2006, the Region III Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency filed with the Environmental Appeals Board ("Board") a notice withdrawing Parts III.E.1-.4 of NPDES Permit No. DC0021199, a final modified Clean Water Act discharge permit issued by Region III to the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority ("WASA") for the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Facility in Washington, D.C. The Regional Administrator is authorized to take this action under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(d).

The withdrawn provisions are the focus of two petitions for review filed with the Board in January 2006, one by WASA (designated as NPDES Appeal No. 05-02) and another by Friends of the Earth and the Sierra Club ("FoE/SC") (designated as NPDES Appeal No. 05-01). Since the filings of these two petitions, Region III and the petitioners have engaged in extensive negotiations regarding the disputed permit conditions. The parties recently concluded that they are unable to reach a negotiated settlement of all their disputes, and Region III decided to withdraw the contested permit terms and propose modifications to those terms. The Region plans to prepare a new draft permit addressing the withdrawn permit conditions and will submit the revised permit terms for public comment in the near future.

Accordingly, on August 21, 2006, Region III filed a "Motion on Consent to Dismiss" FoE/SC's petition in its entirety and WASA's petition as to all issues save one. The one outstanding issue consists of WASA's request for Board review of Region III's decision not to include in the permit a compliance schedule for implementation of WASA's Combined Sewer Overflow Long Term Control Plan. The parties seek a 180-day stay of Region III's deadline to respond to this specific issue, as WASA may yet seek to dismiss its challenge on this issue depending on the nature of the forthcoming proposed permit modifications.

For good cause shown, NPDES Appeal Nos. 05-01 and 05-02 are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in their entireties, except for WASA's sole outstanding issue, which is hereby STAYED until Tuesday, February 20, 2007.¹ On or before the end of the stay period, Region III and WASA must file a report with the Board describing the status of this issue and whether the matter should proceed for consideration by the Board. These dismissals with prejudice have no effect on the petitioners' rights to submit comments on draft permit revisions or modifications pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 124.11, to later petition the Board for appropriate additional permit modifications pursuant to 40 C.F.R. §§ 124.5 and 122.62, or to challenge any future EPA action with respect to NPDES Permit No. DC0021199 or any other permit on any grounds.

So ordered.

Dated: August 23, 2006 Environmental Appeals Judge

¹ Region III's "Motion on Consent to Extend Stay of Proceedings," filed with the Board on August 17, 2006, and seeking a stay of briefing in this matter for an additional seven days, or until August 24, 2006, is hereby GRANTED. The 180-day period runs from this latter date.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petitions for Review and Staying One Issue in the matter of Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant, NPDES Appeal Nos. 05-01 and 05-02, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Facsimile and First Class U.S. Mail:

David E. Evans, Esq.
McGuire Woods L.L.P.
One James Center
901 East Cary Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219-4030
telephone: (804) 775-4317
facsimile: (804) 698-2049

F. Paul Calamita, Esq.
John A. Sheehan, Esq.
AquaLaw P.L.C.
801 East Main Street, Suite 1002
Richmond, Virginia 23219
telephone: (804) 716-9021
facsimile: (804) 716-9022

David S. Baron, Esq.
Earthjustice
1625 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Suite #702
Washington, D.C. 20036-2212
telephone: (202) 667-4500
facsimile: (202) 667-2356

By Facsimile and EPA Pouch Mail:

Deane H. Bartlett
Senior Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III
1650 Arch Street (3RC20)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029
telephone: (215) 814-2776
facsimile: (215) 814-2603

Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace