T-Mobile US, Inc. (Board decision, December 5, 2013)

In re T-Mobile US, Inc. (EAB MM Appeal No. 13-02C): consent agreement ratified

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
MM 13-02C, EPCRA-HQ-2013-8004, CWA-HQ-2013-8004, CAA-HQ-2013-8004, RCRA-HQ-2013-8004
Decided
December 5, 2013
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2013
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board Final Order is a final disposition of the proceeding. The Board ratified the Consent Agreement and ordered T-Mobile US, Inc. to comply with its terms effective immediately. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

T-Mobile US, Inc. was the respondent in a multimedia EPA proceeding involving EPCRA, CWA, CAA, and RCRA dockets. The Environmental Appeals Board ratified the attached Consent Agreement under 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(b)-(c). The Board ordered T-Mobile US, Inc. to comply with all terms of the Consent Agreement, effective immediately. This two-page Final Order does not state the underlying allegations, the agreement's terms, or any penalty amount.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 22.18
  • Outcome: The Consent Agreement was ratified, and T-Mobile US, Inc. was ordered to comply with its terms.
  • Key point: The EAB's final order ratifying a Consent Agreement makes the respondent's compliance obligations effective immediately.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re:

T-Mobile US, Inc.

Docket No. EPCRA-HQ-2013-8004
Docket No. CWA-HQ-2013-8004
Docket No. CAA-HQ-2013-8004
Docket No. RCRA-HQ-2013-8004

FINAL ORDER

Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(b)-(c) of EPA's Consolidated Rules of Practice, the attached Consent Agreement resolving this matter is incorporated by reference into this Final Order and is hereby ratified.

The Respondent is ORDERED to comply with all terms of the Consent Agreement, effective immediately.

So ordered.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Catherine R. McCabe
Environmental Appeals Judge

¹ The three-member panel ratifying this matter is composed of Environmental Appeals Judges Leslye M. Fraser, Randolph L. Hill, and Catherine R. McCabe.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing "Consent Agreement" and "Final Order" in the matter In re: T-Mobile US, Inc., EPCRA-HQ-2013-8004, CWA-HQ-2013-8004, CAA-HQ-2013-8004, and RCRA-HQ-2013-8004, were filed and copies of the same were sent to the following persons in the manner as indicated below:

By Interoffice Mail:

Andrew R. Stewart, Acting Director
Special Litigation and Projects Division
Office of Civil Enforcement
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (MC2248A)
Washington, D.C. 20460

By U.S. Certified Mail:

J. Christopher Luna
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2250 Lakeside Boulevard
Richardson, Texas 75082

Gregory R. Tan
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
1200 17th Street, Suite 2400
Denver, Colorado 80202

Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace