Arch of Illinois (Commission decision, May 9, 2000)

Arch of Illinois (FMSHRC LAKE 98-17-D): Reconsideration denied as untimely

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
LAKE 98-17-D
Decided
May 9, 2000
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-11
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2000, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2000
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Gary D. Morgan asked the Commission to reconsider its denial of discretionary review and requested scientific analysis of test results in his discrimination case against Arch of Illinois. The Commission denied reconsideration because the motion was filed after the 10-day deadline in Commission Procedural Rule 78. It also stated that the request would fail on the merits because Morgan offered no new arguments and reopening the record was inappropriate at that stage. The Commission denied both motions.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.78
  • Outcome: The motion for reconsideration and the motion to have test results scientifically analyzed were denied.
  • Key point: An untimely reconsideration motion cannot reopen the record, and the Commission found no new argument that would justify relief in any event.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006

May 9, 2000

GARY D. MORGAN
:
:
: Docket No. LAKE 98-17-D
:
v. :
:
:
ARCH OF ILLINOIS
:

ORDER

On April 21, 2000, the Commission received a Motion to Reconsider Previous Petition for Discretionary Review and Motion to Have Test Results Scientifically Analyzed from the complainant, Gary D. Morgan. Under Commission Procedural Rule 78, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.78, a motion for reconsideration must be filed within 10 days after a decision or order by the Commission. The Commission denied Morgan’s petition for discretionary review on March 24, 2000. Accordingly, Morgan’s motion for reconsideration is untimely under the Commission’s rules.

Moreover, having examined the arguments raised by Morgan’s motion, we would deny the request for reconsideration in any event. In his motion, Morgan has not raised any new arguments concerning the judge’s decisions that the Commission has not already considered. Further, Morgan’s motion to have his test results scientifically analyzed is essentially a request to reopen the record, which would be inappropriate at this stage of these proceedings.

22 FMSHRC 586


Page 2

For the foregoing reasons, the Motion to Reconsider and the Motion to Have Test Results Scientifically Analyzed are denied.1

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

James C. Riley, Commissioner

Theodore F. Verheggen, Commissioner

Robert H. Beatty, Jr., Commissioner

1
Commissioner Marks would grant the relief requested in the motions.

22 FMSHRC 587


Page 3

Distribution

Leonard D. Rice, Esq.
404 South Washington Street
Du Quoin, IL 62832
for Gary Morgan

Marco J. Rajkovich, Jr., Esq.
Robert I. Cusick, Esq.
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs
250 West Main Street, Suite 1700
Lexington, KY 40507
for Arch of Illinois

22 FMSHRC 588

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace