AMAX Coal Company
AMAX Coal Company (FMSHRC LAKE 96-17): Amended decision issued
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1996 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This amended release corrected a page in an earlier decision involving AMAX Coal Company's LAKE 96-17 proceeding. The release reconfirmed an approved settlement reducing one order's penalty from $2,500 to $2,000 and reproduced the decision's discussion of a citation alleging wet and muddy haulageway conditions that affected equipment control. The official amended release identifies the docket, the parties, the mine, and the cited haulageway condition.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.1403-10(i)
- Outcome: An amended decision substituted a corrected page and reconfirmed the settlement determination stated in the release.
- Key point: The amendment was issued to replace a corrected page under Commission Rule 79.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
[DOCID: f:l96-17a.wais]
AMAX COAL COMPANY
May 13, 1996
LAKE 96-17
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10TH FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
May 13, 1996
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. LAKE 96-17
Petitioner : A. C. No. 11-00877-04131
:
v. :
:
AMAX COAL COMPANY, : Wabash Mine
Respondent :
AMENDED DECISION
Appearances: Ruben R. Chapa, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S.
Dept. of Labor, Chicago, Illinois for Petitioner;
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Buchanan Ingersoll P.C.,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
Pursuant to Commission Rule 79, the attached corrected page
in the decision made May 2, 1996, is hereby substituted.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Ruben R. Chapa, Esq., Christine M. Kassak, Esq., Office of the
Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, 230 S. Dearborn Street, 8th
Floor, Chicago, IL 60604 Certified Mail)
R. Henry Moore, Esq., Buchanan Ingersoll, 301 Grant Street, 20th
Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1410 (Certified Mail)
/jf
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. LAKE 96-17
Petitioner : A.C. No. 11-00877-04131
:
v. :
:
AMAX COAL COMPANY, : Wabash Mine
Respondent :
DECISION
Appearances: Ruben R. Chapa, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Dept. of Labor, Chicago, Illinois for
Petitioner; R. Henry Moore, Esq., Buchanan
Ingersoll P.C., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for
Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon the petition for civil
penalty filed by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to
Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977, 30 U.S.C. � 801, et seq., the "Act," charging
the Amax Coal Company (Amax) with two violations under
the Act and proposing civil penalties of $2,809 for
those violations.
Order No. 4263998
At hearing petitioner filed a motion to approve a
settlement agreement as to this order. A reduction in
penalty from $2,500 to $2,000 was proposed. Based on
the representations and documentation submitted I
concluded that the proffered settlement was acceptable
under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the
Act. That determination is here reconfirmed and an
order directing payment of the penalty is incorporated
herein.
Citation No. 4264052
This citation charges as follows:
"The 25/3W haulageway was not kept free of wet and muddy
conditions. At No. 29 and from 10 to 12 crosscuts
mud and water up to 24 inches in depth affected the
control of equipment."
This citation was issued by MSHA Inspector Robert Stamm on
September 5, 1995, based upon Safeguard No. 3536015 issued
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1996, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.